Haase J E, Heiney S P, Ruccione K S, Stutzer C
University of Arizona College of Nursing, Tucson, AZ 85715-0203, USA.
Int J Cancer Suppl. 1999;12:125-31. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(1999)83:12+<125::aid-ijc22>3.0.co;2-7.
We describe the triangulation of qualitative and quantitative research methods used to develop and test the Adolescent Resilience Model (ARM). The differences in meaning-based and function-based health-related quality of life (HRQL) are discussed, and method triangulation is presented as a means of developing models of HRQL that represent the perspectives of the adolescent and family. Qualitative methods of phenomenology, simultaneous concept analysis, focus groups and thematic analysis were used to generate the ARM. Quantitative instrumentation and structural equation model development and testing were used to evaluate the ARM. A decision-making process for combining qualitative and quantitative research, so that both approaches are equally valued and used, is also presented. Int. J. Cancer Suppl. 12:125-131, 1999.
我们描述了用于开发和测试青少年复原力模型（ARM）的定性和定量研究方法的三角互证法。讨论了基于意义和基于功能的健康相关生活质量（HRQL）的差异，并提出方法三角互证法作为开发代表青少年及其家庭观点的HRQL模型的一种手段。采用现象学、同步概念分析、焦点小组和主题分析等定性方法来生成ARM。运用定量测量工具以及结构方程模型的开发与测试来评估ARM。还介绍了一种定性和定量研究相结合的决策过程，以便同等重视和运用这两种方法。《国际癌症增刊》第12卷：125 - 131页，1999年。
