van de Kerkhof D H, de Boer D, Thijssen J H, Maes R A
Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Human Toxicology, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J Anal Toxicol. 2000 Mar;24(2):102-15. doi: 10.1093/jat/24.2.102.
The ratio of the concentration of testosterone glucuronide to the concentration of epitestosterone glucuronide (T/E ratio) as determined in urine is the most frequently used method to prove testosterone abuse by athletes. A T/E ratio higher than 6 has been considered as proof of abuse in the past; however, cases of naturally occurring higher T/E ratios have been described. Since the introduction of the T/E ratio in doping analysis, the parameters that may or may not influence the T/E ratio, possibly leading to false-positive results, have been debated. To achieve more insight on the influencing circumstances, an overview is given to obtain an objective view on the merits of the urinary T/E ratio. Relevant analytical aspects of the T/E ratio, potential parameters of endogenous and exogenous origins, as well as some alternative methods to determine testosterone abuse, such as the urinary testosterone/luteinizing hormone ratio, gas chromatography-combustion-isotope-ratio mass spectrometry, hair analysis, and high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, are discussed.
尿液中睾酮葡糖苷酸浓度与表睾酮葡糖苷酸浓度之比(T/E比)是目前检测运动员是否滥用睾酮最常用的方法。过去,T/E比高于6被视为滥用的证据;然而,也有自然情况下T/E比升高的案例报道。自T/E比被引入兴奋剂检测分析以来,关于可能影响或不影响T/E比、进而可能导致假阳性结果的参数一直存在争议。为了更深入了解影响因素,本文对尿液T/E比的优缺点进行了综述以获得客观的认识。本文还讨论了T/E比的相关分析方面、内源性和外源性潜在参数,以及一些检测睾酮滥用的替代方法,如尿睾酮/促黄体生成素比、气相色谱-燃烧-同位素比质谱法、毛发分析和高效液相色谱-质谱法。