Aronsson G, Gustafsson K, Dallner M
Program: Health and development in the new working life, National Institute for Working Life, S-112 79 Stockholm, Sweden.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000 Jul;54(7):502-9. doi: 10.1136/jech.54.7.502.
The study is an empirical investigation of sickness presenteeism in relation to occupation, irreplaceability, ill health, sickness absenteeism, personal income, and slimmed down organisation.
Cross sectional design.
Swedish workforce.
The study group comprised a stratified subsample of 3801 employed persons working at the time of the survey, interviewed by telephone in conjunction with Statistics Sweden's labour market surveys of August and September 1997. The response rate was 87 per cent.
A third of the persons in the total material reported that they had gone to work two or more times during the preceding year despite the feeling that, in the light of their perceived state of health, they should have taken sick leave. The highest presenteeism is largely to be found in the care and welfare and education sectors (nursing and midwifery professionals, registered nurses, nursing home aides, compulsory school teachers and preschool/primary educationalists. All these groups work in sectors that have faced personnel cutbacks during the 1990s). The risk ratio (odds ratio (OR)) for sickness presenteeism in the group that has to re-do work remaining after a period of absence through sickness is 2.29 (95% CI 1.79, 2.93). High proportions of persons with upper back/neck pain and fatigue/slightly depressed are among those with high presenteeism (p< 0.001). Occupational groups with high sickness presenteeism show high sickness absenteeism (rho = 0. 38; p<.01) and the hypothesis on level of pay and sickness presenteeism is also supported (rho = -0.22; p<0.01).
Members of occupational groups whose everyday tasks are to provide care or welfare services, or teach or instruct, have a substantially increased risk of being at work when sick. The link between difficulties in replacement or finding a stand in and sickness presenteeism is confirmed by study results. The categories with high sickness presenteeism experience symptoms more often than those without presenteeism. The most common combination is low monthly income, high sickness absenteeism and high sickness presenteeism.
本研究是对与职业、不可替代性、健康不佳、病假缺勤、个人收入及精简组织相关的带病出勤现象进行实证调查。
横断面设计。
瑞典劳动力群体。
研究组由3801名受雇人员组成的分层子样本构成,这些人员在调查时正在工作,于1997年8月和9月瑞典统计局劳动力市场调查期间通过电话进行访谈。应答率为87%。
在全部样本中,三分之一的人员报告称,尽管鉴于自身感知的健康状况,他们觉得应该休病假,但在前一年仍有两次或更多次带病上班。带病出勤比例最高的情况主要出现在护理与福利以及教育部门(护理和助产专业人员、注册护士、养老院护工、义务学校教师以及学前/小学教育工作者。所有这些群体所在的部门在20世纪90年代都面临人员削减)。因病缺勤一段时间后必须重新完成剩余工作的群体中,带病出勤的风险比(优势比(OR))为2.29(95%置信区间1.79,2.93)。上背部/颈部疼痛以及疲劳/轻度抑郁的人员在带病出勤比例高的人群中占比很大(p<0.001)。带病出勤比例高的职业群体病假缺勤率也高(rho = 0.38;p<0.01),关于薪资水平与带病出勤的假设也得到了支持(rho = -0.22;p<0.01)。
日常工作是提供护理或福利服务、教学或指导的职业群体成员,生病时仍坚持工作的风险大幅增加。研究结果证实了替换困难或找人顶岗困难与带病出勤之间的联系。带病出勤比例高的类别比无带病出勤情况的类别更常出现症状。最常见的组合是月收入低、病假缺勤率高和带病出勤比例高。