Neumann P J, Goldie S J, Weinstein M C
Program on the Economic Evaluation of Medical Technology, Center for Risk Analysis, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;21:587-611. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.587.
Estimating preferences for states of health has been an active area of research in recent years. Unlike psychophysical approaches, which discriminate levels of health status, preference-based approaches incorporate values or utilities for health outcomes and can be used in cost-effectiveness analyses to aid resource allocation decisions. This chapter considers issues and controversies involved in using preference-based measures in economic evaluation in health care, with a particular emphasis on cost-utility analysis and the estimation of quality-adjusted life years. Topics considered include techniques for measuring preferences, the use of preference-based classification systems, the relationship between patient and community preferences, methods for obtaining utilities from clinical trials, mapping health status from health utilities, the development of "off-the-shelf" preference weights, and proposed alternatives to quality-adjusted life years. We also consider applications of cost-utility analyses to public health interventions. Although cost-utility analyses have become more popular recently, many challenges remain for the field. Widespread acceptance of the methodology likely awaits more consensus on measurement techniques, as well as educational efforts in the public health and medical communities on the usefulness of the approach.
近年来,评估健康状态偏好一直是一个活跃的研究领域。与区分健康状况水平的心理物理学方法不同,基于偏好的方法纳入了健康结果的价值或效用,可用于成本效益分析,以辅助资源分配决策。本章探讨在医疗保健经济评估中使用基于偏好的测量方法所涉及的问题和争议,特别强调成本效用分析和质量调整生命年的估计。所讨论的主题包括测量偏好的技术、基于偏好的分类系统的使用、患者偏好与社区偏好之间的关系、从临床试验中获取效用的方法、从健康效用映射健康状态、“现成”偏好权重的开发以及质量调整生命年的替代方案。我们还考虑成本效用分析在公共卫生干预措施中的应用。尽管成本效用分析最近变得更加流行,但该领域仍面临许多挑战。该方法的广泛接受可能有待在测量技术上达成更多共识,以及在公共卫生和医疗界开展关于该方法实用性的教育工作。