Hindiyeh M, Jense S, Hohmann S, Benett H, Edwards C, Aldeen W, Croft A, Daly J, Mottice S, Carroll K C
ARUP Laboratories Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Aug;38(8):3076-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.38.8.3076-3079.2000.
The Alexon-Trend, Inc. (Ramsey, Minn.), ProSpecT Campylobacter microplate assay was compared with culture on a Campy-CVA plate (Remel, Lenexa, Kans.) and blood-free campylobacter agar with cefoperazone (20 microg/ml), amphotericin B (10 microg/ml), and teicoplanin (4 microg/ml) (CAT medium; Oxoid Limited, Hampshire, England) with 631 patient stool samples. The CAT medium was used to isolate Campylobacter upsaliensis. The enzyme immunoassay (EIA) had a sensitivity and a specificity of 89 and 99%, respectively, and the positive and negative predictive values were 80 and 99%, respectively. Even though we extensively looked for C. upsaliensis in stool samples from patients from the greater Salt Lake City area, we did not isolate this species during the study period. The overall excellent specificity of the EIA allows rapid detection and treatment of positive patients; however, a negative result should be confirmed by culture when clinical suspicion is high.
将Alexon-Trend公司(明尼苏达州拉姆齐)的ProSpecT弯曲杆菌微孔板检测法与在弯曲杆菌CVA平板(雷米尔公司,堪萨斯州莱尼克斯)以及含头孢哌酮(20微克/毫升)、两性霉素B(10微克/毫升)和替考拉宁(4微克/毫升)的无血弯曲杆菌琼脂(CAT培养基;奥克托德有限公司,英国汉普郡)上的培养法进行比较,共检测了631份患者粪便样本。CAT培养基用于分离唾液弯曲杆菌。酶免疫测定(EIA)的灵敏度和特异性分别为89%和99%,阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为80%和99%。尽管我们在大盐湖城地区患者的粪便样本中广泛寻找唾液弯曲杆菌,但在研究期间未分离出该菌种。EIA总体出色的特异性使得能够对阳性患者进行快速检测和治疗;然而,当临床怀疑度较高时,阴性结果应由培养法加以确认。