Suppr超能文献

阿奇霉素与头孢曲松治疗儿童非复杂性伤寒热的对比研究

Azithromycin versus ceftriaxone for the treatment of uncomplicated typhoid fever in children.

作者信息

Frenck R W, Nakhla I, Sultan Y, Bassily S B, Girgis Y F, David J, Butler T C, Girgis N I, Morsy M

机构信息

US Naval Medical Research Unit #3, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Nov;31(5):1134-8. doi: 10.1086/317450. Epub 2000 Nov 6.

Abstract

A total of 108 children aged 4-17 years were randomized to receive 7 days of azithromycin (10 mg/kg/day; maximum, 500 mg/day) or ceftriaxone (75 mg/kg/day; maximum, 2.5 g/day), to assess the efficacy of the agents for the treatment of uncomplicated typhoid fever. Salmonella typhi was isolated from the initial cultures of blood samples from 64 patients. A total of 31 (91%) of the 34 patients treated with azithromycin and 29 (97%) of the 30 patients treated with ceftriaxone were cured (P>.05). All 64 isolates were susceptible to azithromycin and ceftriaxone. Of the patients treated with ceftriaxone, 4 subsequently had relapse of their infection. No serious side effects occurred in any study subject. Oral azithromycin administered once daily appears to be effective for the treatment of uncomplicated typhoid fever in children. If these results are confirmed, the agent could be a convenient alternative for the treatment of typhoid fever, especially in individuals in developing countries where medical resources are scarce.

摘要

总共108名4至17岁的儿童被随机分配接受7天的阿奇霉素治疗(10毫克/千克/天;最大剂量,500毫克/天)或头孢曲松治疗(75毫克/千克/天;最大剂量,2.5克/天),以评估这些药物治疗非复杂性伤寒热的疗效。从64名患者的血液样本初始培养物中分离出伤寒杆菌。接受阿奇霉素治疗的34名患者中有31名(91%)、接受头孢曲松治疗的30名患者中有29名(97%)治愈(P>0.05)。所有64株分离菌对阿奇霉素和头孢曲松均敏感。接受头孢曲松治疗的患者中有4名随后感染复发。在任何研究对象中均未出现严重副作用。每日口服一次阿奇霉素似乎对治疗儿童非复杂性伤寒热有效。如果这些结果得到证实,该药物可能成为治疗伤寒热的一种便捷替代药物,尤其是在医疗资源稀缺的发展中国家的个体中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验