• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剥夺对发育障碍者参与偏好活动的影响。

Effects of deprivation on engagement in preferred activities by persons with developmental disabilities.

作者信息

Klatt K P, Sherman J A, Sheldon J B

机构信息

University of Kansas, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Winter;33(4):495-506. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-495.

DOI:10.1901/jaba.2000.33-495
PMID:11214025
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1284273/
Abstract

This study examined the effects of deprivation on engagement in activities for 3 adult men with developmental disabilities. First, an assessment was conducted to identify a high- and a low-preference activity for each participant. Second, the high-preference activity was made available following three amounts of deprivation of the activity (15 min, 2 hr, and 1 to 4 days); the low-preference activity was made available following the schedule of deprivation that produced the highest level of engagement by each participant in the high-preference activity. The results were that 1 to 4 days of deprivation produced the highest average amounts of engagement in the high-preference activity for each participant; this amount of deprivation did not produce high engagement in the low-preference activities. Third, the deprivation procedures and results were replicated when high-preference activities were presented by teachers during the participants' daily activities when their engagement had been quite low.

摘要

本研究考察了剥夺对3名成年发育障碍男性参与活动的影响。首先,进行了一项评估,以确定每位参与者的一项高偏好活动和一项低偏好活动。其次,在对该活动进行三种时长的剥夺(15分钟、2小时以及1至4天)之后,提供高偏好活动;按照能使每位参与者在高偏好活动中产生最高参与度的剥夺时间表,提供低偏好活动。结果是,1至4天的剥夺使每位参与者在高偏好活动中的平均参与量最高;这种剥夺时长并未使在低偏好活动中的参与度提高。第三,当教师在参与者日常活动中参与度很低时呈现高偏好活动时,重复了剥夺程序及结果。

相似文献

1
Effects of deprivation on engagement in preferred activities by persons with developmental disabilities.剥夺对发育障碍者参与偏好活动的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Winter;33(4):495-506. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-495.
2
Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment.评估单一刺激参与偏好评估的预测效度。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Winter;34(4):475-85. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-475.
3
Preference assessment procedures for individuals with developmental disabilities.发育障碍个体的偏好评估程序。
Behav Modif. 2004 Sep;28(5):668-77. doi: 10.1177/0145445503259836.
4
Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.一项简短刺激偏好评估的评价
J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Winter;31(4):605-20. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-605.
5
Validating predicted activity preferences of individuals with severe disabilities.验证重度残疾个体的预测活动偏好。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Summer;26(2):239-45. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-239.
6
Comparing preference assessments: selection- versus duration-based preference assessment procedures.比较偏好评估:基于选择与基于持续时间的偏好评估程序
Res Dev Disabil. 2009 Sep-Oct;30(5):1068-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.02.010. Epub 2009 Mar 26.
7
Effects of systematically depriving access to computer-based stimuli on choice responding with individuals with intellectual disabilities.剥夺智障个体使用基于计算机的刺激物的机会对其选择反应的影响。
Res Dev Disabil. 2009 Nov-Dec;30(6):1177-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.03.007. Epub 2009 Jul 3.
8
The effects of establishing operations on preference assessment outcomes.建立操作对偏好评估结果的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Spring;33(1):85-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-85.
9
Treatment of behavior disorders in mental retardation: report on transitioning to atypical antipsychotics, with an emphasis on risperidone.智力障碍中行为障碍的治疗:关于向非典型抗精神病药物过渡的报告,重点是利培酮。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2004 Sep;65(9):1197-210.
10
Duration-based measures of preference for vocational tasks.基于时长的职业任务偏好测量方法。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2002 Fall;35(3):287-90. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-287.

引用本文的文献

1
Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners.刺激偏好评估决策系统(SPADS):从业者的决策模型
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Apr 30;14(4):1144-1156. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00539-3. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Telehealth Delivery of Function-Based Behavioral Treatment for Problem Behaviors Exhibited by Boys with Fragile X Syndrome.远程医疗提供基于功能的行为治疗,用于治疗脆性 X 综合征男孩的问题行为。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2019 Jun;49(6):2461-2475. doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-03963-9.
3
The effects of deprivation, presession exposure, and preferences on teaching manding to children with autism.剥夺、会前接触和偏好对自闭症儿童进行提要求教学的影响。
Anal Verbal Behav. 2005;21(1):135-44. doi: 10.1007/BF03393015.
4
A systematic examination of different parameters of presession exposure to tangible stimuli that maintain problem behavior.对维持问题行为的可触知刺激的会前暴露的不同参数进行系统检查。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Winter;42(4):773-83. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-773.
5
Some determinants of changes in preference over time.偏好随时间变化的一些决定因素。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2006 Summer;39(2):189-202. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2006.163-04.
6
The effects of establishing operations on preferences for tangible items.建立操作对有形物品偏好的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2005 Spring;38(1):107-10. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2005.112-03.
7
Analysis of response allocation in individuals with multiple forms of stereotyped behavior.对具有多种刻板行为形式的个体的反应分配分析。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2004 Winter;37(4):481-501. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2004.37-481.
8
Response-restriction analysis: I. Assessment of activity preferences.反应限制分析:I. 活动偏好评估
J Appl Behav Anal. 2003 Spring;36(1):47-58. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2003.36-47.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of brief social deprivation on behaviors for a social reinforcer.短暂社会剥夺对社会强化物行为的影响。
J Abnorm Psychol. 1958 Jan;56(1):49-56. doi: 10.1037/h0047188.
2
The effects of establishing operations on preference assessment outcomes.建立操作对偏好评估结果的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Spring;33(1):85-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-85.
3
Using neutralizing routines to reduce problem behaviors.运用中和程序来减少问题行为。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Winter;30(4):601-14. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-601.
4
Antecedent influences on behavior disorders.行为障碍的先行影响因素。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Summer;30(2):343-75. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-343.
5
What is the necessary and sufficient condition for reinforcement in the contingency situation?
J Exp Psychol. 1967 Jul;74(3):342-50. doi: 10.1037/h0024719.
6
Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.对重度智力迟钝个体的刺激偏好和强化物价值的评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;18(3):249-55. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-249.
7
Establishing operations and reinforcement effects.建立操作与强化效果。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1991 Summer;24(2):279-91. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-279.
8
Alternating treatments design: one strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject.交替治疗设计:一种在单一受试者中比较两种治疗效果的策略。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1979 Summer;12(2):199-210. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1979.12-199.