Petrikkou E, Rodríguez-Tudela J L, Cuenca-Estrella M, Gómez A, Molleja A, Mellado E
Servicio de Micologia, Centro Nacional de Microbiologia, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28220 Majadahonda, Spain.
J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Apr;39(4):1345-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.4.1345-1347.2001.
Two methods of inoculum preparation for filamentous fungi were compared: counting with a hematocytometer and spectrophotometric adjustment. One hundred eighty-two filamentous fungi pathogenic for humans were used. Colony counts were done for all inoculum preparations. The agreement between the hematocytometer counts and the colony counts (CFU per milliliter) was 97.2%. The reproducibility between the hematocytometer counts and the colony counts by means of an intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.70. Pearson's correlation index for hematocytometer counts versus colony counts was 0.56, whereas that for optical density versus colony counts was 0.008. Both methods can be used for inoculum size adjustment. However, the use of the spectrophotometric method requires that each species be standardized separately.
血细胞计数器计数法和分光光度法调节。使用了182种对人类致病的丝状真菌。对所有接种体制备物进行了菌落计数。血细胞计数器计数与菌落计数(每毫升菌落形成单位)之间的一致性为97.2%。通过组内相关系数,血细胞计数器计数与菌落计数之间的再现性为0.70。血细胞计数器计数与菌落计数的Pearson相关指数为0.56,而光密度与菌落计数的Pearson相关指数为0.008。两种方法均可用于接种量调节。然而,分光光度法的使用要求对每个物种分别进行标准化。