Suppr超能文献

丝状真菌抗真菌药敏试验标准化的比较与协作评估

Comparative and collaborative evaluation of standardization of antifungal susceptibility testing for filamentous fungi.

作者信息

Espinel-Ingroff A, Dawson K, Pfaller M, Anaissie E, Breslin B, Dixon D, Fothergill A, Paetznick V, Peter J, Rinaldi M

机构信息

Medical College of Virginia/Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Feb;39(2):314-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.2.314.

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the interlaboratory agreement of broth dilution susceptibility methods for five species of conidium-forming (size range, 2 to 7 microns) filamentous fungi. The methods used included both macro- and microdilution methods that were adaptations of the proposed reference method of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards for yeasts (m27-P). The MICs of amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, miconazole, and ketoconazole were determined in six centers by both macro- and microdilution tests for 25 isolates of Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus fumigatus, Pseudallescheria boydii, Rhizopus arrhizus, and Sporothrix schenckii. All isolates produced clearly detectable growth within 1 to 4 days at 35 degrees C in the RPMI 1640 medium. Colony counts of 0.4 x 10(6) to 3.3 x 10(6) CFU/ml (mean, 1.4 x 10(6) CFU/ml) were demonstrated in 90% of the 148 inoculum preparations. Overall, good intralaboratory agreement was demonstrated with amphotericin B, fluconazole, and ketoconazole MICs (90 to 97%). The agreement was lower with itraconazole MICs (59 to 79% median). Interlaboratory reproducibility demonstrated similar results: 90 to 100% agreement with amphotericin B, fluconazole, miconazole, and ketoconazole MICs and 59 to 91% with itraconazole MICs. Among the species tested, the MICs for S. schenckii showed the highest variability. The results of the study imply that it may be possible to develop a reference method for antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估五种分生孢子形成(大小范围为2至7微米)丝状真菌肉汤稀释药敏试验方法的实验室间一致性。所使用的方法包括宏观和微观稀释法,它们是对美国国家临床实验室标准委员会针对酵母菌提出的参考方法(m27 - P)的改编。两性霉素B、氟康唑、伊曲康唑、咪康唑和酮康唑的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)在六个中心通过宏观和微观稀释试验,对25株黄曲霉、烟曲霉、波氏假阿利什霉、少根根霉和申克孢子丝菌进行了测定。所有分离株在35℃的RPMI 1640培养基中于1至4天内均产生明显可检测到的生长。在148份接种物制备中,90%的菌落计数为0.4×10⁶至3.3×10⁶CFU/ml(平均为1.4×10⁶CFU/ml)。总体而言,两性霉素B、氟康唑和酮康唑的MIC显示出良好的实验室内一致性(90%至97%)。伊曲康唑MIC的一致性较低(中位数为59%至79%)。实验室间的可重复性显示出类似的结果:两性霉素B、氟康唑、咪康唑和酮康唑MIC的一致性为90%至100%,伊曲康唑MIC的一致性为59%至91%。在所测试的菌种中,申克孢子丝菌的MIC变异性最高。该研究结果表明,有可能为丝状真菌的抗真菌药敏试验制定一种参考方法。

相似文献

7
Collaborative comparison of broth macrodilution and microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests.
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Dec;30(12):3138-45. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.12.3138-3145.1992.
8
In vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi with Sensititre Yeast One.
Mycoses. 2006 Jul;49(4):293-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2006.01250.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antifungal Agents in Critically Ill Patients: Is There a Need for Dose Optimisation?
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 May 12;11(5):645. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11050645.
3
Phytochemical Analysis, Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Properties of L. and Boiss. Essential Oils.
Plants (Basel). 2021 Dec 22;11(1):15. doi: 10.3390/plants11010015.
4
Sixty years of Amphotericin B: An Overview of the Main Antifungal Agent Used to Treat Invasive Fungal Infections.
Infect Dis Ther. 2021 Mar;10(1):115-147. doi: 10.1007/s40121-020-00382-7. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
5
A 9-Year Experience of Infections from Isfahan, Iran.
Infect Drug Resist. 2020 Jul 14;13:2301-2309. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S259162. eCollection 2020.
6
Challenges in the Polyene- and Azole-Based Pharmacotherapy of Ocular Fungal Infections.
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Jan/Feb;35(1):6-22. doi: 10.1089/jop.2018.0089. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
9
Frequency of Cutaneous Fungal Infections and Azole Resistance of the Isolates in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus.
Adv Biomed Res. 2017 Jun 6;6:71. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.191003. eCollection 2017.
10
David and Goliath: chemical perturbation of eukaryotes by bacteria.
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016 Mar;43(2-3):233-48. doi: 10.1007/s10295-015-1686-6. Epub 2015 Oct 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Multicenter evaluation of a broth macrodilution antifungal susceptibility test for yeasts.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Jan;37(1):39-45. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.1.39.
3
Multicenter evaluation of four methods of yeast inoculum preparation.
J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Aug;26(8):1437-41. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.8.1437-1441.1988.
4
Testing of organisms for susceptibility to triazoles: is it justified?
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 May;8(5):387-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01964051.
5
Collaborative investigation of variables in susceptibility testing of yeasts.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 Sep;34(9):1648-54. doi: 10.1128/AAC.34.9.1648.
6
Spectrophotometric method of inoculum preparation for the in vitro susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi.
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Feb;29(2):393-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.2.393-394.1991.
7
Comparison study of broth macrodilution and microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests.
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Jun;29(6):1089-94. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.6.1089-1094.1991.
8
Collaborative comparison of broth macrodilution and microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests.
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Dec;30(12):3138-45. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.12.3138-3145.1992.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验