Jabra-Rizk M A, Brenner T M, Romagnoli M, Baqui A A, Merz W G, Falkler W A, Meiller T F
Department of Oral Medicine, Dental School, University of Maryland, 666 W. Baltimore St., Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2001 May;39(5):2015-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.5.2015-2016.2001.
CHROMagar Candida is a differential culture medium for the isolation and presumptive identification of clinically important yeasts. Recently the medium was reformulated by Becton Dickinson. This study was designed to evaluate the performance of the new formula of CHROMagar against the original CHROMagar Candida for recovery, growth, and colony color with stock cultures and with direct plating of clinical specimens. A total of 90 stock yeast isolates representing nine yeast species, including Candida dubliniensis, as well as 522 clinical specimens were included in this study. No major differences were noted in growth rate or colony size between the two media for most of the species. However, all 10 Candida albicans isolates evaluated consistently gave a lighter shade of green on the new CHROMagar formulation. In contrast, all 26 C. dubliniensis isolates gave the same typical dark green color on both media. A total of 173 of the 522 clinical specimens were positive for yeast, with eight yeast species recovered. The recovery rates for each species were equivalent on both media, with no consistent species-associated differences in colony size or color. Although both media were comparable in performance, the lighter green colonies of C. albicans isolates on the new CHROMagar made it easier to differentiate between C. albicans and C. dubliniensis isolates. In conclusion, the newly formulated Becton Dickinson CHROMagar Candida medium is as equally suited as a differential medium for the presumptive identification of yeast species and for the detection of multiple yeast species in clinical specimens as the original CHROMagar Candida medium.
科玛嘉念珠菌显色培养基是一种用于分离和初步鉴定临床重要酵母菌的鉴别培养基。最近,该培养基由贝克迪金森公司重新配方。本研究旨在评估新配方的科玛嘉培养基与原始科玛嘉念珠菌显色培养基在复苏、生长以及使用标准菌株培养物和直接接种临床标本时菌落颜色方面的性能。本研究共纳入了代表9种酵母菌的90株标准酵母分离株,包括都柏林念珠菌,以及522份临床标本。对于大多数菌种,两种培养基在生长速率或菌落大小方面未发现重大差异。然而,所评估的10株白色念珠菌分离株在新的科玛嘉培养基配方上始终呈现较浅的绿色。相比之下,所有26株都柏林念珠菌分离株在两种培养基上均呈现相同的典型深绿色。522份临床标本中有173份酵母菌检测呈阳性,共分离出8种酵母菌。两种培养基对每种菌种的回收率相当,在菌落大小或颜色方面没有与菌种相关的一致差异。尽管两种培养基性能相当,但新科玛嘉培养基上白色念珠菌分离株的浅绿色菌落使得白色念珠菌和都柏林念珠菌分离株之间更容易区分。总之,新配方的贝克迪金森科玛嘉念珠菌显色培养基与原始科玛嘉念珠菌显色培养基一样,同样适合作为鉴别培养基用于酵母菌菌种的初步鉴定以及临床标本中多种酵母菌的检测。