相似文献
1
Longitudinal analysis of leisure-item preferences.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Summer;34(2):179-84. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-179.
2
Manipulating the behavior-altering effect of the motivating operation: examination of the influence on challenging behavior during leisure activities.
Res Dev Disabil. 2008 Jul-Aug;29(4):333-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2007.06.004. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
3
Comparing preference assessments: selection- versus duration-based preference assessment procedures.
Res Dev Disabil. 2009 Sep-Oct;30(5):1068-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.02.010. Epub 2009 Mar 26.
4
A comparison of verbal and tangible stimulus preference assessments.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Fall;33(3):329-34. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-329.
5
Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Winter;31(4):605-20. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-605.
6
Treatment efficacy of noncontingent reinforcement during brief and extended application.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2003 Spring;36(1):1-19. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2003.36-1.
7
A systematic evaluation of preferences identified through person-centered planning for people with profound multiple disabilities.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Winter;32(4):467-77. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-467.
8
Further evaluation of low-ranked items in stimulus-choice preference assessments.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Spring;33(1):105-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-105.
9
Displacement of leisure reinforcers by food during preference assessments.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):475-84. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-475.
10
Some determinants of changes in preference over time.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2006 Summer;39(2):189-202. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2006.163-04.
引用本文的文献
1
A Survey of Why and How Clinicians Change Reinforcers during Teaching Sessions.
Behav Anal Pract. 2023 Aug 29;17(3):815-830. doi: 10.1007/s40617-023-00847-4. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
A Comparison of Two Procedures for Assessing Preference in a Classroom Setting.
Behav Anal Pract. 2018 Apr 18;12(1):95-104. doi: 10.1007/s40617-018-0244-x. eCollection 2019 Mar.
3
Stability of infants' preference for prosocial others: Implications for research based on single-choice paradigms.
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 2;12(6):e0178818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178818. eCollection 2017.
4
Examining the reinforcing value of stimuli within social and non-social contexts in children with and without high-functioning autism.
Autism. 2017 Oct;21(7):881-895. doi: 10.1177/1362361316655035. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
5
Assessing preferences of individuals with developmental disabilities: a survey of current practices.
Behav Anal Pract. 2012 Winter;5(2):37-48. doi: 10.1007/BF03391822.
6
Teaching self-control with qualitatively different reinforcers.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Winter;45(4):853-7. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-853.
7
Examination of the influence of contingency on changes in reinforcer value.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2011 Fall;44(3):543-58. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-543.
8
Consumption and response output as a function of unit price: manipulation of cost and benefit components.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Fall;42(3):609-25. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-609.
9
Teacher report and direct assessment of preferences for identifying reinforcers for young children.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Spring;40(1):157-66. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.177-05.
10
Some determinants of changes in preference over time.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2006 Summer;39(2):189-202. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2006.163-04.
本文引用的文献
1
Examination of ambiguous stimulus preferences with duration-based measures.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Spring;32(1):111-4. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-111.
2
Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):149-55. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-149.
3
A practical strategy for ongoing reinforcer assessment.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1989 Summer;22(2):171-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1989.22-171.
Zotero 插件