一种持续强化物评估的实用策略。
A practical strategy for ongoing reinforcer assessment.
作者信息
Mason S A, McGee G G, Farmer-Dougan V, Risley T R
机构信息
Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst 01003.
出版信息
J Appl Behav Anal. 1989 Summer;22(2):171-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1989.22-171.
Abstract
There is a need for practical methods of reinforcer assessment that systematically track ongoing changes in clients' preferences. In this study, the effects of a time-efficient reinforcer assessment package were evaluated in a multiple baseline across 3 preschoolers with autism, comparing individualized item selections by experienced teachers with children's presession preferences for items of various sensory qualities. Systematic assessment of children's reinforcers for correct responding virtually eliminated nontargeted maladaptive behaviors, as well as yielding expected improvements in accuracy. The powerful side-effects of potent reinforcers underline the importance of increased attention to reinforcer assessment in research and practice.
摘要
需要有切实可行的强化物评估方法，以便系统地跟踪服务对象偏好的持续变化。在本研究中，对一种省时的强化物评估方案的效果进行了评估，该方案采用多基线设计，涉及3名患有自闭症的学龄前儿童，将经验丰富的教师进行的个性化项目选择与儿童课前对各种感官特性项目的偏好进行比较。对儿童正确反应的强化物进行系统评估，实际上消除了非目标性的适应不良行为，并在准确性方面产生了预期的改善。强效强化物的强大副作用凸显了在研究和实践中加强对强化物评估关注的重要性。
相似文献
1
A practical strategy for ongoing reinforcer assessment.一种持续强化物评估的实用策略。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1989 Summer;22(2):171-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1989.22-171.
2
Response-reinforcer relationships and improved learning in autistic children.自闭症儿童的反应-强化物关系与学习改善
J Appl Behav Anal. 1981 Spring;14(1):53-60. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1981.14-53.
3
The relative motivational properties of sensory and edible reinforcers in teaching autistic children.在教导自闭症儿童方面，感官强化物和可食用强化物的相对激励特性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;18(3):237-48. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-237.
4
Using aberrant behaviors as reinforcers for autistic children.将异常行为用作自闭症儿童的强化物。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Summer;23(2):163-81. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-163.
5
Including unfamiliar stimuli in preference assessments for young children with autism.将不熟悉的刺激物纳入自闭症儿童偏好评估中。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2013 Fall;46(3):689-94. doi: 10.1002/jaba.56. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
6
Comparison of edible and leisure reinforcers.可食用强化物与休闲强化物的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Summer;48(2):331-43. doi: 10.1002/jaba.200. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
7
The effects of blocking mouthing of leisure items on their effectiveness as reinforcers.阻止对休闲物品的啃咬对其作为强化物的有效性的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Winter;40(4):761-5. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.761-765.
8
A comparison of multiple reinforcer assessments to identify the function of maladaptive behavior.多种强化物评估的比较以确定适应不良行为的功能。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2002 Fall;35(3):299-303. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-299.
9
Direct versus indirect response-reinforcer relationships in teaching autistic children.在自闭症儿童教学中直接与间接的反应-强化物关系
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1980 Dec;8(4):537-47. doi: 10.1007/BF00916505.
10
The competition of autistic stereotyped behavior with usual and specially assessed reinforcers.自闭症刻板行为与常规及特别评估的强化物之间的竞争。
Res Dev Disabil. 1987;8(4):607-26. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(87)90056-4.
引用本文的文献
1
Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners.刺激偏好评估决策系统（SPADS）：从业者的决策模型
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Apr 30;14(4):1144-1156. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00539-3. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Effects of Differential Consequences on Choice Making in Students at Risk for Academic Failure.不同后果对学业失败风险学生决策的影响。
Behav Anal Pract. 2018 May 31;12(1):154-161. doi: 10.1007/s40617-018-0267-3. eCollection 2019 Mar.
3
A Comparison of Two Procedures for Assessing Preference in a Classroom Setting.两种在课堂环境中评估偏好的程序的比较。
Behav Anal Pract. 2018 Apr 18;12(1):95-104. doi: 10.1007/s40617-018-0244-x. eCollection 2019 Mar.
4
Systematic assessment of food item preference and reinforcer effectiveness: Enhancements in training laboratory-housed rhesus macaques.食物偏好和强化物有效性的系统评估：圈养恒河猴训练实验室的改进
Behav Processes. 2018 Dec;157:445-452. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
5
An assessment of the efficiency of and child preference for forward and backward chaining.正向链接和反向链接的效率评估及儿童偏好。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2011 Winter;44(4):793-805. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-793.
6
Examination of the influence of contingency on changes in reinforcer value.考察应急性对强化物价值变化的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2011 Fall;44(3):543-58. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-543.
7
Some determinants of changes in preference over time.偏好随时间变化的一些决定因素。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2006 Summer;39(2):189-202. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2006.163-04.
8
Response-restriction analysis: I. Assessment of activity preferences.反应限制分析：I. 活动偏好评估
J Appl Behav Anal. 2003 Spring;36(1):47-58. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2003.36-47.
9
Problem behavior interventions for young children with autism: a research synthesis.针对自闭症幼儿的问题行为干预措施：一项研究综述。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2002 Oct;32(5):423-46. doi: 10.1023/a:1020593922901.
10
Examination of relative reinforcement effects of stimuli identified through pretreatment and daily brief preference assessments.对通过预处理和每日简短偏好评估确定的刺激的相对强化效果进行检查。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Winter;34(4):463-73. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-463.
本文引用的文献
1
Vibration as a reinforcer with a profoundly retarded child.用振动作为强化物对严重智障儿童进行训练。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1969 Summer;2(2):135-7. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1969.2-135.
2
Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis.应用行为分析的一些当前维度。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Spring;1(1):91-7. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-91.
3
The effects and side effects of punishing the autistic behaviors of a deviant child.惩罚问题儿童的异常行为的效果和副作用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Spring;1(1):21-34. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-21.
4
Reinforcer variation: implications for motivating developmentally disabled children.强化物变化：对激励发育障碍儿童的启示
J Appl Behav Anal. 1981 Fall;14(3):345-50. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1981.14-345.
5
The limits and motivating potential of sensory stimuli as reinforcers for autistic children.作为自闭症儿童强化物的感觉刺激的局限性和激励潜力。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1981 Fall;14(3):339-43. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1981.14-339.
6
Response-reinforcer relationships and improved learning in autistic children.自闭症儿童的反应-强化物关系与学习改善
J Appl Behav Anal. 1981 Spring;14(1):53-60. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1981.14-53.
7
Training mildly handicapped peers to facilitate changes in the social interaction skills of autistic children.训练轻度残疾的同龄人以促进自闭症儿童社交互动技能的改变。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1984 Winter;17(4):461-76. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1984.17-461.
8
Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.对重度智力迟钝个体的刺激偏好和强化物价值的评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;18(3):249-55. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-249.
9
The relative motivational properties of sensory and edible reinforcers in teaching autistic children.在教导自闭症儿童方面，感官强化物和可食用强化物的相对激励特性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;18(3):237-48. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-237.
10
Evaluation of reinforcer preferences for profoundly handicapped students.对重度残疾学生强化物偏好的评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Summer;18(2):173-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-173.
Zotero 插件