Graff Richard B, Karsten Amanda M
New England Center for Children.
Behav Anal Pract. 2012 Winter;5(2):37-48. doi: 10.1007/BF03391822.
Although professionals working with individuals with developmental disabilities have much to gain from using systematic methods of reinforcer identification, practitioner knowledge and use of stimulus preference assessments (SPA) has rarely been examined. The purpose of this survey was to assess awareness and implementation of SPAs among professionals who serve people with developmental disabilities within and outside the field of applied behavior analysis. A total of 406 individuals responded to the survey; 246 respondents were recruited via direct email, and 160 respondents were recruited from Internet postings. Fewer than 60% of respondents across all disciplines (i.e., applied behavior analysis, psychology, and special education) reported knowledge of the term stimulus preference assessment. While nearly 90% of behavior analysts reported using at least one direct method of SPA (i.e., an assessment involving direct observation and measurement of behavior), many reported personal lack of knowledge (18.6%) and lack of time (81.4%) as barriers to conducting these assessments on a regular basis. Survey results are discussed in terms of (1) the need for greater awareness and acceptance of reinforcer identification methods among behavior analysts, educators, and other service providers and (2) barrier-specific solutions to potentially increase the regularity of SPA usage in the education and treatment of individuals with developmental disabilities.
尽管为发育障碍患者提供服务的专业人员能从使用系统的强化物识别方法中获益良多,但从业者对刺激偏好评估(SPA)的了解和运用情况却鲜有研究。本次调查旨在评估应用行为分析领域内外为发育障碍患者提供服务的专业人员对刺激偏好评估的知晓程度和实施情况。共有406人回复了该调查;其中246名受访者是通过直接电子邮件招募的,160名受访者是从网络帖子中招募的。所有学科(即应用行为分析、心理学和特殊教育)中,报告知晓刺激偏好评估这一术语的受访者不到60%。虽然近90%的行为分析师报告称使用了至少一种直接的刺激偏好评估方法(即一种涉及直接观察和测量行为的评估),但许多人表示个人知识不足(18.6%)和时间不足(81.4%)是定期进行这些评估的障碍。调查结果从以下两个方面进行了讨论:(1)行为分析师、教育工作者和其他服务提供者需要提高对强化物识别方法的认识并予以接受;(2)针对具体障碍的解决方案,以潜在地提高在发育障碍患者教育和治疗中使用刺激偏好评估的频率。