Measuring patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk.
作者信息
Bowling A, Ebrahim S
机构信息
Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, Royal Free Campus, London NW3 2PF, UK.
出版信息
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i2-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100002...
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Measuring patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk.衡量患者对治疗的偏好和对风险的认知。
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i2-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100002...
2
Suffering in deference: a focus group study of older cardiac patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk.顺从中的痛苦：一项关于老年心脏病患者治疗偏好和风险认知的焦点小组研究
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i23-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100023...
3
The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments.患者对治疗风险的理解程度。
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i14-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100014...
4
Understanding risk and lessons for clinical risk communication about treatment preferences.理解风险以及关于治疗偏好的临床风险沟通的经验教训。
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i9-13. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100009...
5
Informed consent: moral necessity or illusion?知情同意：道德必需还是幻想？
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i29-33. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100029...
6
Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools.患者参与医疗决策偏好的变异性：对决策支持工具使用的启示
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i34-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100034...
7
Information and participation in decision-making about treatment: a qualitative study of the perceptions and preferences of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.治疗相关信息及参与决策：一项关于类风湿关节炎患者认知与偏好的定性研究
J Med Ethics. 2008 Nov;34(11):775-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.023705.
8
Giving the patient a say. No, really.让患者有发言权。不，是真的。
Hosp Health Netw. 2013 May;87(5):26-31, 1.
9
The doctor advises; the patient decides.医生提供建议；患者做出决定。
Med Educ. 2010 Mar;44(3):323. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03568.x.
10
Why do patients want information if not to take part in decision making?如果患者不是为了参与决策，他们为什么想要信息呢？
J Med Ethics. 2010 Dec;36(12):834-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.036491. Epub 2010 Sep 8.
引用本文的文献
1
Identifying the drivers of overall rating of cancer care: Insights from the second wave of the Swiss Cancer Patient Experiences study.识别癌症护理总体评分的驱动因素：来自瑞士癌症患者体验研究第二波的见解。
Cancer. 2024 Dec 15;130(24):4334-4346. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35506. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
2
Patients' experience with a community pharmacy fall prevention service.患者对社区药房跌倒预防服务的体验。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2023 Jan 20;9:100223. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100223. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
The use of 3D digital anatomy model improves the communication with patients presenting with prostate disease: The first experience in Senegal.使用 3D 数字解剖模型可改善与前列腺疾病患者的沟通：塞内加尔的首次经验。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0277397. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277397. eCollection 2022.
4
Smoking cessation using preference-based tools among socially disadvantaged smokers: study protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial.基于偏好的工具在社会劣势吸烟者中戒烟的效果：一项实用、多中心随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 30;11(6):e048859. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048859.
5
Pharmacy fall prevention services for the community-dwelling elderly: Patient engagement and expectations.社区居住的老年人药学预防跌倒服务：患者参与和期望。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Jul;30(4):1450-1461. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13475. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
6
Involving people with type 2 diabetes in facilitating participation in a cardiovascular screening programme.让 2 型糖尿病患者参与促进心血管筛查计划的实施。
Health Expect. 2021 Jun;24(3):880-891. doi: 10.1111/hex.13228. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
7
A Smartphone-Based Technique to Detect Dynamic User Preferences for Tailoring Behavioral Interventions: Observational Utility Study of Ecological Daily Needs Assessment.一种基于智能手机的技术，用于检测用户对行为干预措施的动态偏好定制：生态日常需求评估的观察效用研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 13;8(11):e18609. doi: 10.2196/18609.
8
Patient expectations, experiences and satisfaction with nintedanib and pirfenidone in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a quantitative study.特发性肺纤维化患者对尼达尼布和吡非尼酮的期望、体验和满意度：一项定量研究。
Respir Res. 2020 Jul 23;21(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01458-1.
9
Attributes Underlying Non-surgical Treatment Choice for People With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Mixed Studies Review.非手术治疗选择与腰痛人群相关的属性：系统混合研究综述。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Mar 14;10(4):201-210. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.49.
10
Satisfaction of Patients and Physicians with Treatments for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Population-Based Survey in China.类风湿关节炎患者和医生对治疗的满意度：一项基于中国人群的调查。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Jun 23;14:1037-1047. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S232578. eCollection 2020.
本文引用的文献
1
Risks--listen and don't mislead.风险——倾听，不要误导。
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Apr;51(465):259-60.
2
It's official: evaluative research must become part of routine care in the NHS.正式宣布：评估性研究必须成为英国国家医疗服务体系常规护理的一部分。
J R Soc Med. 2000 Nov;93(11):555-6. doi: 10.1177/014107680009301101.
3
To cure or not to cure, that is not the question.治愈与否，并非问题所在。
J R Soc Med. 2000 Dec;93(12):611-3. doi: 10.1177/014107680009301202.
4
Evidence-based patient empowerment.基于证据的患者赋权。
Qual Health Care. 2000 Dec;9(4):200-1. doi: 10.1136/qhc.9.4.200.
5
Information for patients.患者须知。
J R Soc Med. 2000 Sep;93(9):467-71. doi: 10.1177/014107680009300905.
6
A guide to patient-led good controlled trials.患者主导的良好对照试验指南。
Lancet. 2000 Aug 26;356(9231):774. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)73681-3.
7
Patient preference-based treatment thresholds and recommendations: a comparison of decision-analytic modeling with the probability-tradeoff technique.基于患者偏好的治疗阈值与建议：决策分析模型与概率权衡技术的比较
Med Decis Making. 2000 Oct-Dec;20(4):394-403. doi: 10.1177/0272989X0002000403.
8
The impact of patients' preferences on the treatment of atrial fibrillation: observational study of patient based decision analysis.患者偏好对房颤治疗的影响：基于患者的决策分析观察性研究
BMJ. 2000 May 20;320(7246):1380-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7246.1380.
9
Older Americans hold on to life dearly.美国老年人非常珍视生命。
BMJ. 2000 Apr 29;320(7243):1206.
10
Do not resuscitate decisions: flogging dead horses or a dignified death? Resuscitation should not be withheld from elderly people without discussion.不进行心肺复苏的决定：徒劳之举还是尊严死？未经讨论，不应不给老年人进行心肺复苏。
BMJ. 2000 Apr 29;320(7243):1155-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7243.1155.
Zotero 插件