Suppr超能文献

患者对治疗风险的理解程度。

The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments.

作者信息

Lloyd A J

机构信息

Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK.

出版信息

Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i14-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100014...

Abstract

The scientific understanding of how people perceive and code risks and then use this information in decision making has progressed greatly in the last 20 years. There is considerable evidence that people employ simplifying heuristics in judgement and decision making. These heuristics may lead to bias in how people interpret information. However, much of our understanding of risk perception is based on laboratory studies. It is much less clear whether risk perception in the real world (as in the case of medical treatments) exhibits the same patterns and biases. This paper reviews the published literature on risk perception in patients who face substantial treatment risks. It examines how accurate patients' perception of risk is, what factors affect the perception of risk, and several possible explanations for why patients' risk perception is not always accurate.

摘要

在过去20年里,人们对于人类如何感知和编码风险,以及如何在决策中运用这些信息的科学理解取得了长足进展。有大量证据表明,人们在判断和决策过程中采用简化的启发式方法。这些启发式方法可能导致人们在解释信息时产生偏差。然而,我们对风险感知的大部分理解都基于实验室研究。在现实世界中(如医疗治疗的情况),风险感知是否表现出相同的模式和偏差则不太明确。本文回顾了关于面临重大治疗风险的患者的风险感知的已发表文献。它考察了患者对风险的感知有多准确,哪些因素影响风险感知,以及对于患者风险感知为何并不总是准确的几种可能解释。

相似文献

1
The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments.
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i14-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100014...
2
Measuring patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk.
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i2-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100002...
3
Suffering in deference: a focus group study of older cardiac patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk.
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i23-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100023...
4
Understanding risk and lessons for clinical risk communication about treatment preferences.
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i9-13. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100009...
6
Why do patients want information if not to take part in decision making?
J Med Ethics. 2010 Dec;36(12):834-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.036491. Epub 2010 Sep 8.
8
Informed consent: moral necessity or illusion?
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i29-33. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100029...
9
How should effectiveness of risk communication to aid patients' decisions be judged? A review of the literature.
Med Decis Making. 1999 Oct-Dec;19(4):428-34. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9901900411.
10
Has patients' involvement in the decision-making process changed over time?
Health Expect. 2006 Dec;9(4):333-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00413.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical considerations in shoulder arthroplasty in patients who are obese.
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2024 Sep 19;5(2):216-221. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.08.012. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Risk perception of healthcare workers in the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil.
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 1;10(3):e25297. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25297. eCollection 2024 Feb 15.
5
Parents' perspectives on SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations for children: a qualitative analysis.
CMAJ. 2023 Feb 21;195(7):E259-E266. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.221401.
6
Trust Deficit in Surgical Systems in an Urban Slum in India Under Universal Health Coverage: A Mixed Method Study.
Int J Public Health. 2022 Jul 14;67:1604924. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604924. eCollection 2022.
7
Consent in organ transplantation: putting legal obligations and guidelines into practice.
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Jul 5;23(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00791-y.
8
Surgical Decision-Making for Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: Patient Experiences of the Informed Consent Process.
Front Neurol. 2021 Dec 8;12:780306. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.780306. eCollection 2021.
9
Are Regulations Safe? Reflections From Developing a Digital Cancer Decision-Support Tool.
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2021 Mar;5:353-363. doi: 10.1200/CCI.20.00148.

本文引用的文献

1
Importance of risk communication and decision making in cardiovascular conditions in older patients: a discussion paper.
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i19-22. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100019...
2
Understanding risk and lessons for clinical risk communication about treatment preferences.
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i9-13. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100009...
3
4
The role of risk and benefit perception in informed consent for surgery.
Med Decis Making. 2001 Mar-Apr;21(2):141-9. doi: 10.1177/0272989X0102100207.
5
Implementing shared decision-making in routine practice: barriers and opportunities.
Health Expect. 2000 Sep;3(3):182-191. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2000.00093.x.
8
Women's perceptions of breast cancer risk: how you ask matters.
Med Decis Making. 1999 Jul-Sep;19(3):221-9. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9901900301.
9
Patients' understanding of medical risks: implications for genetic counseling.
Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jun;93(6):910-4. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00567-5.
10
Misunderstanding in cancer patients: why shoot the messenger?
Ann Oncol. 1999 Jan;10(1):39-46. doi: 10.1023/a:1008336415362.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验