Peter E A, Janssen P A, Grange C S, Douglas M J
Department of Anaesthesia, University of British Columbia and the Children's and Women's Health Centre of British Columbia, Vancouver.
CMAJ. 2001 Oct 30;165(9):1203-9.
Pain from episiotomy or tearing of perineal tissues during childbirth is often poorly treated and may be severe. This randomized double-blind controlled trial was performed to compare the effectiveness, side effects and cost of, and patient preference for, 2 analgesics for the management of postpartum perineal pain.
A total of 237 women who gave birth vaginally with episiotomy or a third- or fourth-degree tear between August 1995 and November 1996 at a tertiary-level teaching and referral centre for obstetric care in Vancouver were randomly assigned to receive either ibuprofen (400 mg) (n = 127) or acetaminophen (600 mg) with codeine (60 mg) and caffeine (15 mg) (Tylenol No. 3) (n = 110), both given orally every 4 hours as necessary. Pain ratings were recorded before the first dose and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 12 and 24 hours after the first dose on a 10-cm visual analogue scale. Side effects and overall opinion were assessed at 24 hours.
Ibuprofen and acetaminophen with codeine had similar analgesic properties in the first 24 hours post partum (mean pain rating 3.4 and 3.3, mean number of doses in 24 hours 3.4 and 3.3, and proportion of treatment failures 13.8% [16/116] and 16.0% [16/100] respectively). Significantly fewer subjects in the ibuprofen group than in the acetaminophen with codeine group experienced side effects (52.4% v. 71.7%) (p = 0.006). There were no significant differences in overall patient satisfaction between the 2 groups. The major determinant of pain intensity was forceps-assisted delivery. Overall, 78% of the treatment failures were in women with forceps-assisted deliveries.
Since the 2 analgesics were rated similarly, ibuprofen may be the preferred choice because it is less expensive and requires less nursing time to dispense. Further studies need to address improved analgesia for women with forceps-assisted deliveries.
分娩时会阴切开术或会阴组织撕裂引起的疼痛常常治疗不佳,且可能较为严重。本随机双盲对照试验旨在比较两种镇痛药治疗产后会阴疼痛的有效性、副作用、成本及患者偏好。
1995年8月至1996年11月期间,在温哥华一家三级产科教学及转诊中心经阴道分娩且伴有会阴切开术或三度或四度会阴撕裂的237名妇女被随机分配,分别口服布洛芬(400毫克)(n = 127)或对乙酰氨基酚(600毫克)加可待因(60毫克)及咖啡因(15毫克)(泰诺3号)(n = 110),必要时每4小时服用一次。在首次给药前及首次给药后1、2、3、4、12和24小时,采用10厘米视觉模拟评分法记录疼痛评分。在24小时时评估副作用及总体评价。
布洛芬和对乙酰氨基酚加可待因在产后最初24小时具有相似的镇痛效果(平均疼痛评分分别为3.4和3.3,24小时内平均给药次数分别为3.4和3.3,治疗失败率分别为13.8%[16/116]和16.0%[16/100])。布洛芬组出现副作用的受试者明显少于对乙酰氨基酚加可待因组(52.4%对71.7%)(p = 0.006)。两组患者的总体满意度无显著差异。疼痛强度的主要决定因素是产钳助产。总体而言,78%的治疗失败病例发生在产钳助产的妇女中。
由于两种镇痛药的评分相似,布洛芬可能是首选,因为其成本较低且给药所需护理时间较少。需要进一步研究改善产钳助产妇女的镇痛效果。