Fong D Y, Lam K F, Lawless J F, Lee Y W
Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China.
Lifetime Data Anal. 2001 Dec;7(4):345-62. doi: 10.1023/a:1012544714667.
We consider recurrent event data when the duration or gap times between successive event occurrences are of intrinsic interest. Subject heterogeneity not attributed to observed covariates is usually handled by random effects which result in an exchangeable correlation structure for the gap times of a subject. Recently, efforts have been put into relaxing this restriction to allow non-exchangeable correlation. Here we consider dynamic models where random effects can vary stochastically over the gap times. We extend the traditional Gaussian variance components models and evaluate a previously proposed proportional hazards model through a simulation study and some examples. Besides, semiparametric estimation of the proportional hazards models is considered. Both models are easily used. The Gaussian models are easily interpreted in terms of the variance structure. On the other hand, the proportional hazards models would be more appropriate in the context of survival analysis, particularly in the interpretation of the regression parameters. They can be sensitive to the choice of model for random effects but not to the choice of the baseline hazard function.
当相继事件发生之间的持续时间或间隔时间具有内在研究价值时,我们会考虑复发事件数据。未归因于观测协变量的个体异质性通常通过随机效应来处理,这会导致个体间隔时间具有可交换的相关结构。最近,人们致力于放宽这一限制,以允许非可交换相关性。在此,我们考虑动态模型,其中随机效应可在间隔时间上随机变化。我们扩展了传统的高斯方差分量模型,并通过模拟研究和一些实例评估了先前提出的比例风险模型。此外,还考虑了比例风险模型的半参数估计。这两种模型都易于使用。高斯模型在方差结构方面易于解释。另一方面,比例风险模型在生存分析的背景下会更合适,特别是在回归参数的解释方面。它们可能对随机效应模型的选择敏感,但对基线风险函数的选择不敏感。