Suppr超能文献

道路上异常行为的自我报告:希腊驾驶员样本中的错误与违规行为

Self-reports of aberrant behaviour on the roads: errors and violations in a sample of Greek drivers.

作者信息

Kontogiannis Tom, Kossiavelou Zoe, Marmaras Nicolas

机构信息

Department of Production Engineering and Management, Technical University of Crete, Chunia GR, Greece.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2002 May;34(3):381-99. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(01)00035-5.

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that unsafe driver acts can be classified into two distinct categories (i.e.. errors and violations) entailing different measures for reducing road traffic accidents. A survey of over 1,400 drivers in Greece is reported in which a variety of aberrant driving behaviours have been identified. The present study has confirmed the results of earlier studies in the driving populations of Britain. Australia and Sweden that errors and violations are the major determinants in the factor structure of aberrant behaviours. Three types of violations were identified including, highway code-, aggressive- and parking-violations (or situational violations). Mistakes and lapses were two major forms of errors. The factor analysis identified another two classes of behaviour that could not be accounted for very well by the error-violation distinction. One class of behaviours referred to a state of low preparedness and negligence while the other class referred to communication errors and 'social disregard' for the other road users. Each class of behaviour was found to have different demographic correlates. Finally, accident liability was predicted by self-reported tendency to commit highway-code violations, but not by tendency to make errors due to failures of judgement (i.e.. mistakes) or lapses. Aggressive violations were significantly related to involvement in speeding convictions and law-breaking whilst highway-code violations were related to speeding convictions only.

摘要

最近的研究表明,不安全驾驶行为可分为两个不同的类别(即错误和违规),这需要采取不同的措施来减少道路交通事故。报告了一项对希腊1400多名司机的调查,其中识别出了各种异常驾驶行为。本研究证实了英国、澳大利亚和瑞典驾驶人群早期研究的结果,即错误和违规是异常行为因素结构中的主要决定因素。识别出了三种违规类型,包括违反交通规则、攻击性和停车违规(或情境违规)。失误和疏忽是错误的两种主要形式。因素分析确定了另外两类行为,错误-违规区分无法很好地解释这两类行为。一类行为指的是准备不足和疏忽的状态,而另一类行为指的是沟通错误和对其他道路使用者的“社会漠视”。发现每类行为都有不同的人口统计学关联。最后,事故责任是通过自我报告的违反交通规则的倾向来预测的,而不是通过因判断失误(即错误)或疏忽而犯错的倾向来预测的。攻击性违规与超速定罪和违法显著相关,而违反交通规则仅与超速定罪相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验