Kontogiannis Tom
Department of Production Engineering and Management, Technical University of Crete, University campus, Chania 73100, Crete, Greece.
Accid Anal Prev. 2006 Sep;38(5):913-24. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.03.002. Epub 2006 Apr 18.
This paper presents an investigation into the relationship between driver stress, coping strategies and aberrant driving of a Greek sample of company employees (N=714). The results supported the main factor structures of the Driver Behavior Inventory (Matthews, G., Tsuda, A., Xin, G., Ozeki, Y., 1999. Individual differences in driver stress vulnerability in a Japanese sample. Ergonomics 42, 401-415) and Driver Behavior Questionnaire (Kontogiannis, T., Kossiavelou, Z., Marmaras, N., 2002. Self-reports of aberrant behavior on the roads: errors and violations in a sample of Greek drivers. Accident Anal. Prev. 34, 391-399). An inventory of coping strategies was also examined in terms of self reports. Confrontive coping was characteristic of drivers high on aggression who also had higher rates of mistakes and violations. Coping in terms of self-criticism was exhibited by drivers high on dislike of driving (i.e., anxiety) who reported a higher incidence of mistakes. Task-focus coping was characteristic of alertness and had a weak correlation with confidence. Drivers high in confidence reported fewer mistakes and violations which, in association with low perception of risk, was a particularly worrying aspect of driving. A contextual model of accident involvement was tested with LISREL in which violations yielded a direct effect whilst aggression yielded an indirect effect mediated by violations. Alertness and confidence were both related to safety orientation but failed to predict accident rates and speeding convictions.
本文对希腊企业员工样本(N = 714)的驾驶员压力、应对策略与异常驾驶之间的关系进行了调查。结果支持了驾驶员行为量表(Matthews, G., Tsuda, A., Xin, G., Ozeki, Y., 1999. 日本样本中驾驶员压力易感性的个体差异。《人类工程学》42, 401 - 415)和驾驶员行为问卷(Kontogiannis, T., Kossiavelou, Z., Marmaras, N., 2002. 道路上异常行为的自我报告:希腊驾驶员样本中的失误与违规。《事故分析与预防》34, 391 - 399)的主要因素结构。还根据自我报告对应对策略量表进行了考察。对抗性应对是攻击性较强的驾驶员的特征,他们的失误和违规率也更高。自我批评式应对表现于那些对驾驶厌恶程度高(即焦虑)的驾驶员,他们报告的失误发生率更高。任务聚焦式应对是警觉性的特征,与自信心的相关性较弱。自信心强的驾驶员报告的失误和违规较少,这与低风险认知相关联,是驾驶中一个特别令人担忧的方面。用LISREL测试了一个事故卷入情境模型,其中违规产生直接影响,而攻击性通过违规产生间接影响。警觉性和自信心都与安全导向相关,但未能预测事故率和超速定罪情况。