Riefer David M, Knapp Bethany R, Batchelder William H, Bamber Donald, Manifold Victor
Department of Psychology, California State University, 5500 University Parkway, San Bernardino, California 92407-2397, USA.
Psychol Assess. 2002 Jun;14(2):184-201. doi: 10.1037//1040-3590.14.2.184.
This article demonstrates how multinomial processing tree models can be used as assessment tools to measure cognitive deficits in clinical populations. This is illustrated with a model developed by W. H. Batchelder and D. M. Riefer (1980) that separately measures storage and retrieval processes in memory. The validity of the model is tested in 2 experiments, which show that presentation rate affects the storage of items (Experiment 1) and part-list cuing hurts item retrieval (Experiment 2). Experiments 3 and 4 examine 2 clinical populations: schizophrenics and alcoholics with organic brain damage. The model reveals that each group exhibits deficits in storage and retrieval, with the retrieval deficits being stronger and occurring more consistently over trials. Also, the alcoholics with organic brain damage show no improvement in retrieval over trials, although their storage improves at the same rate as a control group.
本文展示了多项加工树模型如何作为评估工具来测量临床人群的认知缺陷。这通过W. H. 巴彻尔德和D. M. 里弗(1980年)开发的一个模型来说明,该模型分别测量记忆中的存储和检索过程。该模型的有效性在两个实验中得到检验,实验表明呈现速率会影响项目的存储(实验1),部分列表提示会损害项目检索(实验2)。实验3和实验4研究了两个临床人群:精神分裂症患者和患有器质性脑损伤的酗酒者。该模型显示,每组在存储和检索方面都存在缺陷,检索缺陷更强,并且在多次试验中更一致地出现。此外,患有器质性脑损伤的酗酒者在多次试验中检索方面没有改善,尽管他们的存储改善速度与对照组相同。