Suppr超能文献

针对儿童的非治疗性研究:格里姆斯诉肯尼迪·克里格研究所案

Nontherapeutic research with children: Grimes v Kennedy Krieger Institute.

作者信息

Glantz Leonard H

机构信息

Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2002 Jul;92(7):1070-3. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.7.1070.

Abstract

Research with young children raises difficult issues of law and ethics. A recent Maryland case, Grimes v Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc, appears to impose restrictive rules on research with children when the subjects are put at risk but cannot derive direct benefit from their involvement in the research project. This case exemplifies the tension that exists between the goal of science to increase knowledge and the protection of the rights and welfare of nonconsenting research subjects. While some language in the opinion may be difficult to understand or apply, for the most part the case reflects the problems other courts and ethicists have had in delineating the role of children in "nontherapeutic" research.

摘要

对幼儿进行研究引发了法律和伦理方面的棘手问题。马里兰州最近的一个案例,即格莱姆斯诉肯尼迪·克里格研究所案,似乎对涉及儿童的研究施加了限制性规定,即当研究对象面临风险但无法从参与研究项目中直接受益时。这个案例体现了科学增加知识的目标与保护不同意参与研究的对象的权利和福利之间存在的紧张关系。虽然该判决意见中的某些措辞可能难以理解或应用,但在很大程度上,这个案例反映了其他法院和伦理学家在界定儿童在“非治疗性”研究中的角色时所遇到的问题。

相似文献

1
Nontherapeutic research with children: Grimes v Kennedy Krieger Institute.
Am J Public Health. 2002 Jul;92(7):1070-3. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.7.1070.
2
Risk and responsibility: ethics, Grimes v Kennedy Krieger, and public health research involving children.
Am J Public Health. 2002 Jul;92(7):1073-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.7.1073.
4
Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc.
Wests Atl Report. 2001;782:807-62.
5
Walking the moral tightrope: respecting and protecting children in health-related research.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2002 Summer;11(3):217-29. doi: 10.1017/s096318010211303x.
6
Children as subjects in nontherapeutic research. Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc.
J Leg Med. 2002 Sep;23(3):421-36. doi: 10.1080/01947640290050274.
9
In defense of the Hopkins Lead Abatement Studies.
J Law Med Ethics. 2002 Spring;30(1):50-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2002.tb00719.x.
10
Risk standards for pediatric research: rethinking the Grimes ruling.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2004 Jun;14(2):187-98. doi: 10.1353/ken.2004.0024.

引用本文的文献

1
Two Novel Urban Health Primary Care Residency Tracks That Focus On Community-Level Structural Vulnerabilities.
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Dec;33(12):2250-2255. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4272-y. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
2
Stakeholder Opinions And Ethical Perspectives Support Complete Disclosure Of Incidental Findings In MRI Research.
Ethics Behav. 2015 Jul 1;25(4):332-350. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2014.938338. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
3
Trials and tribulations of protecting children from environmental hazards.
Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Oct;114(10):1609-12. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9001.
4
An exploration of ethical issues in research in children's health and the environment.
Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Oct;114(10):1603-8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9000.
7
Ethics in public health institutions.
Am J Public Health. 2002 Dec;92(12):1884-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.12.1884.

本文引用的文献

1
Mengele's birthmark: the Nuremberg Code in United States courts.
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1991 Spring;7:17-45.
2
Research with children.
Am J Law Med. 1998;24(2-3):213-44.
4
Proxy consent in the experimentation situation.
Perspect Biol Med. 1974 Autumn;18(1):2-20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验