Glantz Leonard H
Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Am J Public Health. 2002 Jul;92(7):1070-3. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.7.1070.
Research with young children raises difficult issues of law and ethics. A recent Maryland case, Grimes v Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc, appears to impose restrictive rules on research with children when the subjects are put at risk but cannot derive direct benefit from their involvement in the research project. This case exemplifies the tension that exists between the goal of science to increase knowledge and the protection of the rights and welfare of nonconsenting research subjects. While some language in the opinion may be difficult to understand or apply, for the most part the case reflects the problems other courts and ethicists have had in delineating the role of children in "nontherapeutic" research.
对幼儿进行研究引发了法律和伦理方面的棘手问题。马里兰州最近的一个案例,即格莱姆斯诉肯尼迪·克里格研究所案,似乎对涉及儿童的研究施加了限制性规定,即当研究对象面临风险但无法从参与研究项目中直接受益时。这个案例体现了科学增加知识的目标与保护不同意参与研究的对象的权利和福利之间存在的紧张关系。虽然该判决意见中的某些措辞可能难以理解或应用,但在很大程度上,这个案例反映了其他法院和伦理学家在界定儿童在“非治疗性”研究中的角色时所遇到的问题。