风险与责任：伦理学、格林斯诉肯尼迪·克里格案以及涉及儿童的公共卫生研究
Risk and responsibility: ethics, Grimes v Kennedy Krieger, and public health research involving children.
作者信息
Mastroianni Anna C, Kahn Jeffrey P
机构信息
University of Washington School of Law and the Institute for Public Health Genetics, Seattle, USA.
出版信息
Am J Public Health. 2002 Jul;92(7):1073-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.7.1073.
Abstract
The legal case of Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc, has raised concerns in the public health research community regarding the acceptable level of risk in research involving children, parental authority for informed consent, and exploitation of research subjects for the benefit of public health. We provide an overview of the case and discuss the impact of the court's decision and its possible effect on future research protection policies and practices.
摘要
格莱姆斯诉肯尼迪·克里格研究所案引发了公共卫生研究界对涉及儿童的研究中可接受的风险水平、家长的知情同意权以及为公共卫生利益而对研究对象的利用等问题的关注。我们概述了该案件，并讨论了法院判决的影响及其对未来研究保护政策和实践可能产生的作用。
相似文献
1
Risk and responsibility: ethics, Grimes v Kennedy Krieger, and public health research involving children.风险与责任：伦理学、格林斯诉肯尼迪·克里格案以及涉及儿童的公共卫生研究
Am J Public Health. 2002 Jul;92(7):1073-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.7.1073.
2
Nontherapeutic research with children: Grimes v Kennedy Krieger Institute.针对儿童的非治疗性研究：格里姆斯诉肯尼迪·克里格研究所案
Am J Public Health. 2002 Jul;92(7):1070-3. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.7.1070.
3
4
Walking the moral tightrope: respecting and protecting children in health-related research.行走在道德钢索上：在与健康相关的研究中尊重和保护儿童
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2002 Summer;11(3):217-29. doi: 10.1017/s096318010211303x.
5
In defense of the Hopkins Lead Abatement Studies.为霍普金斯铅污染治理研究辩护。
J Law Med Ethics. 2002 Spring;30(1):50-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2002.tb00719.x.
6
Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc.格里姆斯诉肯尼迪·克里格研究所
Wests Atl Report. 2001;782:807-62.
7
Risk standards for pediatric research: rethinking the Grimes ruling.儿科研究的风险标准：重新审视格莱姆斯裁决
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2004 Jun;14(2):187-98. doi: 10.1353/ken.2004.0024.
8
Pediatric research regulations under legal scrutiny: Grimes narrows their interpretation.儿科研究法规接受法律审查：格莱姆斯缩小了对其的解释范围。
J Law Med Ethics. 2002 Spring;30(1):38-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2002.tb00718.x.
9
Group benefit and protection of pediatric research subjects: Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger and the Lead Abatement Study.儿童研究受试者的群体利益与保护：格里姆斯诉肯尼迪·克里格研究所及铅污染消除研究
Account Res. 2002 Jul-Dec;9(3-4):177-92. doi: 10.1080/08989620214682.
引用本文的文献
1
Placing Publics in Public Health Genomics.将公众纳入公共卫生基因组学
Public Health Genomics. 2024;27(1):23-29. doi: 10.1159/000535942. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
2
South African traditional values and beliefs regarding informed consent and limitations of the principle of respect for autonomy in African communities: a cross-cultural qualitative study.南非传统价值观和信念对知情同意的影响，以及在非洲社区中尊重自主权原则的局限性：一项跨文化定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Aug 14;22(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00678-4.
3
Medical Ethics in the 70 Years after the Nuremberg Code, 1947 to the Present.《纽伦堡法典》颁布70年后的医学伦理，1947年至今
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2018 Jun;130(Suppl 3):159-253. doi: 10.1007/s00508-018-1343-y.
4
Deliberate Microbial Infection Research Reveals Limitations to Current Safety Protections of Healthy Human Subjects.蓄意微生物感染研究揭示了当前健康人类受试者安全保护措施的局限性。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Aug;21(4):1049-64. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9579-z. Epub 2014 Aug 24.
5
Practical approaches to incidental findings in brain imaging research.脑成像研究中偶然发现的实用处理方法。
Neurology. 2008 Jan 29;70(5):384-90. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000280469.17461.94.
6
Trials and tribulations of protecting children from environmental hazards.保护儿童免受环境危害的艰难历程。
Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Oct;114(10):1609-12. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9001.
7
An exploration of ethical issues in research in children's health and the environment.儿童健康与环境研究中的伦理问题探讨。
Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Oct;114(10):1603-8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9000.
8
Justice and fairness in the Kennedy Krieger Institute lead paint study: the ethics of public health research on less expensive, less effective interventions.肯尼迪·克里格研究所含铅涂料研究中的公正与公平：关于成本较低、效果较差干预措施的公共卫生研究伦理
Am J Public Health. 2006 May;96(5):781-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.063719. Epub 2006 Mar 29.
9
Methodologic and logistic issues in conducting longitudinal birth cohort studies: lessons learned from the Centers for Children's Environmental Health and Disease Prevention Research.开展纵向出生队列研究中的方法学与后勤问题：从儿童环境卫生与疾病预防研究中心获得的经验教训
Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Oct;113(10):1419-29. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7670.
10
Canaries in the mines: children, risk, non-therapeutic research, and justice.矿井中的金丝雀：儿童、风险、非治疗性研究与正义
J Med Ethics. 2004 Apr;30(2):176-81.
本文引用的文献
1
The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research.《贝尔蒙报告》。保护人类研究受试者的伦理原则与准则。
J Am Coll Dent. 2014 Summer;81(3):4-13.
Zotero 插件