Morrison L, Begg D J, Langley J D
Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Inj Prev. 2002 Jun;8(2):111-5. doi: 10.1136/ip.8.2.111.
To compare personal and situational influences on incidents involving drink driving with those involving sober driving.
Information on a range of road safety practices was sought in face to face interviews conducted with 969 members of the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study cohort at age 26 years. A total of 750 study members reported an incident that involved the opportunity to consume alcohol and also travel by motor vehicle. Of these, 87 were classified as "drink drive incidents" and 663 as "sober drive incidents".
Study members who were male, of lower socioeconomic status, had no school qualifications, or were dependent on alcohol or marijuana at age 21 were significantly more likely to report a drink drive incident at age 26. Compared with the sober drive incidents, the drink drive incidents were more commonly associated with driving alone, drinking at bars, and no advanced planning. For drink drive incidents the amount of alcohol consumed was influenced by the conviviality of the occasion, whereas for sober drive incidents it was the need to drive. One quarter of those reporting drink drive incidents stated they had used marijuana and/or LSD at the event at which they drank.
Drink drive and sober drive incidents differed, particularly with regard to decisions made before the event. Prevention efforts could usefully be targeted toward these decisions.
比较个人因素和情境因素对涉及酒驾事件与清醒驾驶事件的影响。
在对达尼丁多学科健康与发展研究队列中969名26岁成员进行的面对面访谈中,收集了一系列道路安全行为的信息。共有750名研究成员报告了一起涉及饮酒机会且需驾车出行的事件。其中,87起被归类为“酒驾事件”,663起为“清醒驾驶事件”。
21岁时为男性、社会经济地位较低、未获得学历、或对酒精或大麻有依赖的研究成员,在26岁时更有可能报告酒驾事件。与清醒驾驶事件相比,酒驾事件更常与独自驾驶、在酒吧饮酒以及未提前规划相关。对于酒驾事件,饮酒量受场合欢乐氛围的影响,而对于清醒驾驶事件,饮酒量则受驾驶需求的影响。报告酒驾事件的人中,有四分之一表示他们在饮酒的场合使用了大麻和/或麦角酸二乙酰胺(LSD)。
酒驾事件和清醒驾驶事件存在差异,尤其是在事件发生前做出的决定方面。预防工作可以有效地针对这些决定。