Tong Rosemarie
Department of Philosophy, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.
J Med Philos. 2002 Aug;27(4):417-32. doi: 10.1076/jmep.27.4.417.8609.
Teaching bioethics in the new millennium requires its practitioners to confront a wide area of methodological alternatives. This essay chronicles the author's journey from the principlism of Beauchamp and Childress, through narrative and postmodern bioethics, to a complex feminist critique of postmodern bioethics that emphasizes functional human capabilities and the creation of structures that can facilitate free discussion of those capabilities and how best to realize them. Teaching bioethics concerns not only the acknowledgement of differences but also reminding ourselves of our samenesses. Sustained Habermasian democratic conversations might help us to escape the narrow confines of a postmodern bioethics of moral strangers for a richer world of moral friends.
在新千年教授生物伦理学要求从业者面对广泛的方法选择。本文记录了作者从博尚和奇尔德雷斯的原则主义出发,历经叙事和后现代生物伦理学,再到对后现代生物伦理学的复杂女性主义批判的历程,这种批判强调人类的功能性能力以及创建能够促进对这些能力进行自由讨论以及如何最好地实现这些能力的结构。教授生物伦理学不仅关乎承认差异,还关乎提醒我们自己我们的相同之处。持续的哈贝马斯式民主对话可能会帮助我们摆脱道德陌生人的后现代生物伦理学的狭隘局限,进入一个道德朋友的更丰富世界。