Wei James Cheng-Chung, Wong Ruey-Hong, Huang Jun-Huang, Yu Chen-Tung, Chou Chung-Tei, Jan Ming-Shiou, Tsay Gregory J, Chou Ming-Chih, Lee Hong-Shen
Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Clin Rheumatol. 2007 Oct;26(10):1685-91. doi: 10.1007/s10067-007-0573-6. Epub 2007 Feb 8.
The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Global Score (BAS-G) have been recommended for evaluating function and disability in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The aim of this study was to develop a Chinese version of the BASDAI, BASFI, and BAS-G and assess their reliability and validity. The Chinese version was obtained after a translation and back-translation process. A total of 447 patients with adult and juvenile AS were assessed using these three instruments. Reliability was tested by internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Internal consistency of the instrument was given as Cronbach's alpha. Test-retest reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient. To assess the sensitivity to change, 153 patients were included in an 8-week follow-up study. In our analysis, the reliability of these three instruments-the BASDAI, BASFI, and BAS-G-for a 24-h test-retest showed acceptable intraclass correlation coefficients (0.92-0.94). Our Chinese versions of the BASDAI, BASFI, and BAS-G also showed 0.87, 0.94, and 0.90, respectively, with Cronbach's alpha coefficient, indicating good reliability. For sensitivity to change in 8-week follow-up, all three instruments showed 5.0 to 5.4% changes. Our Chinese versions of the BASDAI, BASFI, and BAS-G showed adequate reliability, validity, and responsiveness to clinical change. Thus, disease activity and functional status in Chinese-speaking patients with AS may be adequately evaluated with these versions of the original instruments.
巴斯强直性脊柱炎疾病活动指数(BASDAI)、巴斯强直性脊柱炎功能指数(BASFI)和巴斯强直性脊柱炎整体评分(BAS - G)已被推荐用于评估强直性脊柱炎(AS)患者的功能和残疾情况。本研究的目的是开发BASDAI、BASFI和BAS - G的中文版,并评估其信度和效度。中文版是经过翻译和回译过程后获得的。使用这三种工具对总共447例成人和青少年AS患者进行了评估。通过内部一致性和重测信度来测试信度。工具的内部一致性以Cronbach's α系数表示。通过组内相关系数评估重测信度。为了评估对变化的敏感性,153例患者被纳入了一项为期8周的随访研究。在我们的分析中,这三种工具——BASDAI、BASFI和BAS - G——在24小时重测中的信度显示出可接受 的组内相关系数(0.92 - 0.94)。我们的BASDAI、BASFI和BAS - G中文版的Cronbach's α系数分别也显示为0.87、0.94和0.90,表明信度良好。对于8周随访中的变化敏感性,所有三种工具都显示出5.0%至5.4%的变化。我们的BASDAI、BASFI和BAS - G中文版显示出足够的信度、效度以及对临床变化的反应性。因此,使用这些原始工具的中文版可以充分评估说中文的AS患者的疾病活动和功能状态。