• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Reproducibility of proton MR spectroscopic imaging (PEPSI): comparison of dyslexic and normal-reading children and effects of treatment on brain lactate levels during language tasks.质子磁共振波谱成像(PEPSI)的可重复性:诵读困难儿童与正常阅读儿童的比较以及语言任务期间治疗对脑乳酸水平的影响
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002 Nov-Dec;23(10):1678-85.
2
Effects of a phonologically driven treatment for dyslexia on lactate levels measured by proton MR spectroscopic imaging.一种针对诵读困难的语音驱动治疗对通过质子磁共振波谱成像测量的乳酸水平的影响。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000 May;21(5):916-22.
3
Instructional treatment associated with changes in brain activation in children with dyslexia.与诵读困难儿童大脑激活变化相关的指导性治疗。
Neurology. 2003 Jul 22;61(2):212-9. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000068363.05974.64.
4
Dyslexic children have abnormal brain lactate response to reading-related language tasks.阅读障碍儿童在面对与阅读相关的语言任务时,大脑对乳酸的反应异常。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999 Sep;20(8):1393-8.
5
Lobar asymmetries in subtypes of dyslexic and control subjects.阅读障碍患者与对照组受试者各亚型中的脑叶不对称性。
J Child Neurol. 2006 Nov;21(11):922-31. doi: 10.1177/08830738060210110201.
6
Comparison of fMRI and PEPSI during language processing in children.
Magn Reson Med. 2001 Feb;45(2):217-25. doi: 10.1002/1522-2594(200102)45:2<217::aid-mrm1030>3.0.co;2-3.
7
Functional disruption in the organization of the brain for reading in dyslexia.阅读障碍患者大脑阅读功能组织的功能性破坏。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Mar 3;95(5):2636-41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.5.2636.
8
Atypical brain activation of reading processes in children with developmental dyslexia.发育性阅读障碍儿童阅读过程中的非典型脑激活。
J Child Neurol. 2002 Dec;17(12):867-71. doi: 10.1177/08830738020170121601.
9
Anatomical correlates of dyslexia: frontal and cerebellar findings.阅读障碍的解剖学关联:额叶和小脑的研究结果。
Brain. 2003 Feb;126(Pt 2):482-94. doi: 10.1093/brain/awg026.
10
From word reading to multisentence comprehension: Improvements in brain activity in children with autism after reading intervention.从单词阅读到多句理解:阅读干预后自闭症儿童大脑活动的改善。
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Aug 14;16:303-312. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.08.012. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Proton metabolic mapping of the brain at 7 T using a two-dimensional free induction decay-echo-planar spectroscopic imaging readout with lipid suppression.使用二维自由感应衰减回波平面波谱成像读出和脂质抑制技术在 7T 下进行脑质子代谢图谱成像。
NMR Biomed. 2022 Oct;35(10):e4771. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4771. Epub 2022 May 26.
2
Reading intervention and neuroplasticity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of brain changes associated with reading intervention.阅读干预与神经可塑性:阅读干预相关的大脑变化的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Jan;132:465-494. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.11.011. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
3
Accelerated MR spectroscopic imaging-a review of current and emerging techniques.加速磁共振波谱成像——当前和新兴技术综述。
NMR Biomed. 2021 May;34(5):e4314. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4314. Epub 2020 May 12.
4
Neuroscience illuminating the influence of auditory or phonological intervention on language-related deficits.神经科学揭示了听觉或语音干预对语言相关缺陷的影响。
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 17;6:137. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00137. eCollection 2015.
5
Distinct neural signatures of cognitive subtypes of dyslexia with and without phonological deficits.具有和不具有语音缺陷的诵读困难症认知亚型的独特神经特征。
Neuroimage Clin. 2013 Mar 25;2:477-90. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2013.03.010. eCollection 2013.
6
Neuroimaging of reading intervention: a systematic review and activation likelihood estimate meta-analysis.阅读干预的神经影像学研究:系统综述和激活似然估计荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 10;9(1):e83668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083668. eCollection 2014.
7
Does IQ affect the functional brain network involved in pseudoword reading in students with reading disability? A magnetoencephalography study.智商是否会影响阅读障碍学生在假词阅读中涉及的功能脑网络?一项脑磁图研究。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Jan 8;7:932. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00932. eCollection 2014.
8
Transcranial direct current stimulation: a remediation tool for the treatment of childhood congenital dyslexia?经颅直流电刺激:治疗儿童先天性阅读障碍的一种矫正工具?
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Apr 22;7:139. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00139. eCollection 2013.
9
Maternal history of reading difficulty is associated with reduced language-related gray matter in beginning readers.阅读困难母亲的病史与初读者语言相关的灰质减少有关。
Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 1;59(3):3021-32. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.024. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
10
Engagement of temporal lobe regions predicts response to educational interventions in adolescent struggling readers.颞叶区域的参与可预测青少年阅读困难者对教育干预的反应。
Dev Neuropsychol. 2011;36(7):869-88. doi: 10.1080/87565641.2011.606404.

本文引用的文献

1
Disruption of posterior brain systems for reading in children with developmental dyslexia.发育性阅读障碍儿童大脑后部阅读系统的破坏。
Biol Psychiatry. 2002 Jul 15;52(2):101-10. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01365-3.
2
A functional magnetic resonance imaging study during sentence reading in Japanese dyslexic children.一项针对日本诵读困难儿童句子阅读过程的功能磁共振成像研究。
Brain Dev. 2001 Aug;23(5):312-6. doi: 10.1016/s0387-7604(01)00228-5.
3
fMRI auditory language differences between dyslexic and able reading children.诵读困难儿童与阅读能力正常儿童之间的功能磁共振成像听觉语言差异。
Neuroreport. 2001 May 8;12(6):1195-201. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200105080-00029.
4
Disrupted neural responses to phonological and orthographic processing in dyslexic children: an fMRI study.阅读障碍儿童对语音和正字法加工的神经反应中断:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Neuroreport. 2001 Feb 12;12(2):299-307. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200102120-00024.
5
Comparison of fMRI and PEPSI during language processing in children.
Magn Reson Med. 2001 Feb;45(2):217-25. doi: 10.1002/1522-2594(200102)45:2<217::aid-mrm1030>3.0.co;2-3.
6
Brain activation profiles in dyslexic children during non-word reading: a magnetic source imaging study.阅读假词时诵读困难儿童的脑激活模式:一项磁源成像研究。
Neurosci Lett. 2000 Aug 18;290(1):61-5. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(00)01322-7.
7
Effects of a phonologically driven treatment for dyslexia on lactate levels measured by proton MR spectroscopic imaging.一种针对诵读困难的语音驱动治疗对通过质子磁共振波谱成像测量的乳酸水平的影响。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000 May;21(5):916-22.
8
fMRI during word processing in dyslexic and normal reading children.诵读困难儿童和正常阅读儿童在文字处理过程中的功能磁共振成像
Neuroreport. 1999 Nov 8;10(16):3459-65. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199911080-00036.
9
Dyslexic children have abnormal brain lactate response to reading-related language tasks.阅读障碍儿童在面对与阅读相关的语言任务时,大脑对乳酸的反应异常。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999 Sep;20(8):1393-8.
10
Neural systems affected in developmental dyslexia revealed by functional neuroimaging.功能神经影像学揭示的发育性阅读障碍中受影响的神经系统。
Neuron. 1998 Aug;21(2):279-82. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80537-1.

质子磁共振波谱成像(PEPSI)的可重复性:诵读困难儿童与正常阅读儿童的比较以及语言任务期间治疗对脑乳酸水平的影响

Reproducibility of proton MR spectroscopic imaging (PEPSI): comparison of dyslexic and normal-reading children and effects of treatment on brain lactate levels during language tasks.

作者信息

Richards Todd L, Berninger Virginia W, Aylward Elizabeth H, Richards Anne L, Thomson Jennifer B, Nagy William E, Carlisle Joanne F, Dager Stephen R, Abbott Robert D

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002 Nov-Dec;23(10):1678-85.

PMID:12427623
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8185817/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We repeated a proton echo-planar spectroscopic imaging (PEPSI) study to test the hypothesis that children with dyslexia and good readers differ in brain lactate activation during a phonologic judgment task before but not after instructional treatment.

METHODS

We measured PEPSI brain lactate activation (TR/TE, 4000/144; 1.5 T) at two points 1-2 months apart during two language tasks (phonologic and lexical) and a control task (passive listening). Dyslexic participants (n = 10) and control participants (n = 8) (boys and girls aged 9-12 years) were matched in age, verbal intelligence quotients, and valid PEPSI voxels. In contrast to patients in past studies who received combined treatment, our patients were randomly assigned to either phonologic or morphologic (meaning-based) intervention between the scanning sessions.

RESULTS

Before treatment, the patients showed significantly greater lactate elevation in the left frontal regions (including the inferior frontal gyrus) during the phonologic task. Both patients and control subjects differed significantly in the right parietal and occipital regions during both tasks. After treatment, the two groups did not significantly differ in any brain region during either task, but individuals given morphologic treatment were significantly more likely to have reduced left frontal lactate activation during the phonologic task.

CONCLUSION

The previous finding of greater left frontal lactate elevation in children with dyslexia during a phonologic judgment task was replicated, and brain activation changed as a result of treatment. However, the treatment effect was due to the morphologic component rather than the phonologic component.

摘要

背景与目的

我们重复了一项质子回波平面光谱成像(PEPSI)研究,以检验以下假设:在接受教学治疗之前而非之后的语音判断任务中,诵读困难儿童与阅读能力良好的儿童在大脑乳酸激活方面存在差异。

方法

我们在两项语言任务(语音和词汇)及一项对照任务(被动聆听)期间,于相隔1 - 2个月的两个时间点测量了PEPSI大脑乳酸激活情况(重复时间/回波时间,4000/144;1.5T)。诵读困难参与者(n = 10)和对照参与者(n = 8)(年龄在9 - 12岁的男孩和女孩)在年龄、言语智商和有效的PEPSI体素方面进行了匹配。与过去研究中接受联合治疗的患者不同,我们的患者在扫描期间被随机分配到语音或形态学(基于意义)干预组。

结果

治疗前,患者在语音任务期间左侧额叶区域(包括额下回)的乳酸升高明显更大。在两项任务期间,患者和对照受试者在右侧顶叶和枕叶区域均存在显著差异。治疗后,两组在任何一项任务期间任何脑区均无显著差异,但接受形态学治疗的个体在语音任务期间左侧额叶乳酸激活降低的可能性显著更高。

结论

重复了之前关于诵读困难儿童在语音判断任务中左侧额叶乳酸升高更明显的发现,且治疗导致大脑激活发生了变化。然而,治疗效果归因于形态学成分而非语音成分。