Aksoy Mete H, Vargel Ibrahim, Canter Ibrahim H, Erk Yücel, Sargon Mustafa, Pinar Asli, Tezel Güler G
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2002 Sep-Oct;26(5):388-96. doi: 10.1007/s00266-002-1121-z.
Many aspects of the biology and effective therapy of proliferative scars remain undefined, in part due to a lack of an accurate, practical, reproducible, and economical animal model for systematically studying hypertrophic scars. This study was designed to investigate whether hypertrophic scar formation could be induced in guinea pigs by removal of the panniculus carnosus alone, and by a combination of the removal of the panniculus carnosus with application of coal tar afterwards. Whole thickness skin excision or deep partial thickness injury was used to create the lesions on intact skin. Different anatomic locations were tested in different groups. Scars thus developed were examined morphologically by light microscopy and electron microscopy (TEM and SEM) and biochemically by measuring the activity of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) to check whether these scars had morphological and biochemical properties specific to hypertrophic scars. The albino guinea pigs used in this study were divided into three groups. Removal of the panniculus carnosus was performed from the ventral aspect of the torso in animals in groups I and II. On the skin overlying the area of panniculectomy, circular skin excision was performed in group I, and deep partial thickness burn injury was inflicted in group II, to see whether wounds would heal with hypertrophic scars. In group III, dorsal aspect of the torso were used and wounds were produced by circular skin excisions followed by panniculectomy on both sides but coal tar was applied to only one side. Tissue samples were taken from the scars that were hypertrophic in appearance, and from normal scars and normal skin for comparison. Light and electron microscopic examinations and G6PD activity measurements were performed on these samples. While hypertrophic scar development was not seen in group I and group II, scars with morphological and biochemical properties specific to hypertrophic scars developed in one third of animals in group III after healing of the wounds treated with coal tar. In conclusion, it is shown that it is possible to develop experimental hypertrophic scars in guinea pigs with morphological and biochemical properties similar to those of human proliferative scars. Therefore this model is a new, practical, and economical experimental animal model to study proliferative scars, although improvements are needed to increase yield.
增生性瘢痕生物学和有效治疗方法的许多方面仍不明确,部分原因是缺乏一种准确、实用、可重复且经济的动物模型来系统研究肥厚性瘢痕。本研究旨在探究单独切除豚鼠的腹直肌,以及切除腹直肌后再涂抹煤焦油是否能诱导豚鼠形成肥厚性瘢痕。采用全层皮肤切除或深度部分厚度损伤在完整皮肤上制造创口。不同组测试不同的解剖位置。对由此形成的瘢痕进行光镜和电镜(透射电镜和扫描电镜)形态学检查,并通过测量葡萄糖-6-磷酸脱氢酶(G6PD)活性进行生化检查,以确定这些瘢痕是否具有肥厚性瘢痕特有的形态学和生化特性。本研究中使用的白化豚鼠分为三组。在第一组和第二组动物的躯干腹侧进行腹直肌切除。在第一组的腹直肌切除区域上方的皮肤进行圆形皮肤切除,在第二组造成深度部分厚度烧伤损伤,以观察伤口是否会愈合形成肥厚性瘢痕。在第三组中,使用躯干背侧,通过圆形皮肤切除制造创口,然后在两侧进行腹直肌切除,但仅在一侧涂抹煤焦油。从外观呈肥厚性的瘢痕以及正常瘢痕和正常皮肤中采集组织样本进行比较。对这些样本进行光镜和电镜检查以及G6PD活性测量。虽然在第一组和第二组中未观察到肥厚性瘢痕形成,但在第三组中,经煤焦油处理的伤口愈合后,三分之一的动物形成了具有肥厚性瘢痕特有的形态学和生化特性的瘢痕。总之,研究表明在豚鼠中有可能形成具有与人增生性瘢痕相似的形态学和生化特性的实验性肥厚性瘢痕。因此,尽管需要改进以提高成功率,但该模型是一种用于研究增生性瘢痕的新的、实用且经济的实验动物模型。