Cherpes Thomas L, Ashley Rhoda L, Meyn Leslie A, Hillier Sharon L
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Feb;41(2):671-4. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.2.671-674.2003.
Serologic assays that utilize herpes simplex virus (HSV) type-specific glycoproteins G-1 (HSV-1) and G-2 (HSV-2) to discriminate between antibodies against HSV-1 and HSV-2 are sensitive and specific. However, the high rates of seroreversion, defined as the change in an individual's antibody status from positive to negative over time, previously reported in longitudinal evaluations of glycoprotein G type-specific tests suggests that their use in HSV acquisitional studies would be problematic. To further explore the reliability of the glycoprotein G-based serologic tests, we evaluated HSV-1 and HSV-2 enzyme immunoassays from Focus Technologies in a longitudinal cohort of 1207 young women from Pittsburgh, Pa. On enrollment of the women in the study, HSV-1 and HSV-2 antibodies were detected in 46.6 and 24.9% of the women, respectively. Among the women with at least three visits, 3.4% (15 of 447) of those who were HSV-1 antibody positive had a subsequent negative result while fewer than 1% (2 of 227) of those who were HSV-2 antibody positive seroreverted. The median of mean positive index values for women who seroreverted to HSV-1 antibody was lower than that for women who remained seropositive (1.25 versus 7.06; P < 0.001). Similarly, the median of mean positive index values for women whose HSV-2 antibody status reverted from positive to negative was lower than that for those women who did not serorevert (1.83 versus 7.46; P = 0.02). Comparative Western blot analysis demonstrated that the lower positive index values, seen more often among the HSV seroreverters, often signified false-positive immunoassay results. Overall, the seroreversion rates were low; the use of glycoprotein G-based serologic tests for the measurement of HSV-1 and HSV-2 antibodies in incidence studies therefore appears warranted.
利用单纯疱疹病毒1型(HSV - 1)和2型(HSV - 2)特异性糖蛋白G - 1和G - 2来区分抗HSV - 1和抗HSV - 2抗体的血清学检测方法灵敏且特异。然而,先前在糖蛋白G型特异性检测的纵向评估中报告的血清学逆转率较高,血清学逆转定义为个体抗体状态随时间从阳性变为阴性,这表明它们在HSV获得性研究中的应用存在问题。为了进一步探究基于糖蛋白G的血清学检测的可靠性,我们在宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡的1207名年轻女性的纵向队列中评估了Focus Technologies公司的HSV - 1和HSV - 2酶免疫测定。在这些女性入组研究时,分别有46.6%和24.9%的女性检测到HSV - 1和HSV - 2抗体。在至少接受三次访视的女性中,HSV - 1抗体阳性者中有3.4%(447人中的15人)随后检测结果转为阴性,而HSV - 2抗体阳性者中血清学逆转的比例不到1%(227人中的2人)。血清学逆转至HSV - 1抗体阴性的女性平均阳性指数值中位数低于血清学仍为阳性的女性(1.25对7.06;P < 0.001)。同样,HSV - 2抗体状态从阳性转为阴性的女性平均阳性指数值中位数低于未发生血清学逆转的女性(1.83对7.46;P = 0.02)。比较性免疫印迹分析表明,在HSV血清学逆转者中更常见的较低阳性指数值通常意味着免疫测定结果为假阳性。总体而言,血清学逆转率较低;因此,在发病率研究中使用基于糖蛋白G的血清学检测方法来测量HSV - 1和HSV - 2抗体似乎是合理的。