• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Learned changes in the sensitivity of stimulus representations: associative and nonassociative mechanisms.

作者信息

Hall Geoffrey

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of York, York, UK.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol B. 2003 Feb;56(1):43-55. doi: 10.1080/02724990244000151.

DOI:10.1080/02724990244000151
PMID:12623536
Abstract

Central to associative learning theory is the proposal that the concurrent activation of a pair of event representations will establish or strengthen a link between them. Associative theorists have devoted much energy to establishing what representations are involved in any given learning paradigm and the rules that determine the degree to which the link is strengthened. They have paid less attention to the question of what determines that a representation will be activated, assuming, for the case of classical conditioning, that presentation of an appropriately intense stimulus from an appropriate modality will be enough. But this assumption is unjustified. I present the results of experiments on the effects of stimulus exposure in rats that suggest that mere exposure to a stimulus can influence its perceptual effectiveness -- that the ability of a stimulus to activate its representation can be changed by experience. This conclusion is of interest for two reasons. First, it supplies a direct explanation for the phenomenon of perceptual learning -- the enhancement of stimulus discriminability produced by some forms of stimulus exposure. Second, it poses a theoretical challenge in that it seems to require the existence of a learning mechanism outside the scope of those envisaged by current formal theories of associative learning. I offer some speculations as to how this mechanism might be incorporated into such theories.

摘要

相似文献

1
Learned changes in the sensitivity of stimulus representations: associative and nonassociative mechanisms.
Q J Exp Psychol B. 2003 Feb;56(1):43-55. doi: 10.1080/02724990244000151.
2
A model of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in representations of the unconditional stimulus.巴甫洛夫条件反射模型:无条件刺激表征的变化
Integr Physiol Behav Sci. 1995 Jan-Mar;30(1):12-33. doi: 10.1007/BF02691387.
3
Contributions of associative and non-associative learning to the dynamics of defensive ethograms.联合学习和非联合学习对防御行为图谱动态变化的贡献。
Elife. 2024 Dec 16;12:RP90414. doi: 10.7554/eLife.90414.
4
Learning about cues in their absence: evidence from flavour preferences and aversions.
Q J Exp Psychol B. 2003 Feb;56(1):56-67. doi: 10.1080/02724990244000160.
5
Habituation and conditioning: Salience change in associative learning.习惯化与条件作用:联想学习中的显著性变化。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2017 Jan;43(1):48-61. doi: 10.1037/xan0000129.
6
The role of associative history in models of associative learning: a selective review and a hybrid model.联想历史在联想学习模型中的作用:选择性综述与混合模型
Q J Exp Psychol B. 2004 Jul;57(3):193-243. doi: 10.1080/02724990344000141.
7
Reward Adaptation and the Mechanisms of Learning: Contrast Changes Reward Value in Rats and Drives Learning.奖励适应与学习机制:对比大鼠的奖励值变化和驱动学习。
Psychol Sci. 2018 Feb;29(2):219-227. doi: 10.1177/0956797617729825. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
8
Theories of associative learning in animals.动物联想学习理论。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:111-39. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.111.
9
The influence of comparison between similar stimuli on the effectiveness of their unique features.相似刺激之间的比较对其独特特征有效性的影响。
Behav Processes. 2008 May;78(1):112-6. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.12.001. Epub 2007 Dec 8.
10
Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis Modulates Fear Learning through Associative and Nonassociative Mechanisms.成年海马神经发生通过联想和非联想机制调节恐惧学习。
J Neurosci. 2015 Aug 12;35(32):11330-45. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0483-15.2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Pre-Exposure to an Electrical Stimulus Primes Associative Pairing of Audio and Electrical Stimuli for Dairy Heifers in a Virtual Fencing Feed Attractant Trial.在虚拟围栏饲料引诱试验中,预先暴露于电刺激可使奶牛小母牛对音频和电刺激进行联想配对。
Animals (Basel). 2020 Jan 28;10(2):217. doi: 10.3390/ani10020217.
2
The Implicit Activation Mechanism of Culture: A Survey Experiment on Associations with Childbearing.文化的隐性激活机制:关于生育关联的一项调查实验
Poetics (Amst). 2018 Aug;69:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
3
Pre-exposure Schedule Effects on Generalization of Taste Aversion and Palatability for Thirsty and Not Thirsty Rats.
暴露前时间表对口渴和不口渴大鼠味觉厌恶泛化及适口性的影响。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 5;9:878. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00878. eCollection 2018.
4
Perceptual learning transfer in an appetitive Pavlovian task.在一项正向巴甫洛夫任务中的知觉学习迁移
Learn Behav. 2017 Jun;45(2):115-123. doi: 10.3758/s13420-016-0245-y.
5
Perceptual learning with tactile stimuli in rats: Changes in the processing of a dimension.大鼠触觉刺激的知觉学习:维度加工的变化
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2016 Jul;42(3):281-9. doi: 10.1037/xan0000104.
6
The fate of redundant cues: Further analysis of the redundancy effect.冗余线索的命运:对冗余效应的进一步分析。
Learn Behav. 2015 Mar;43(1):72-82. doi: 10.3758/s13420-014-0162-x.
7
Within-subjects assessment of the within-compound associations resulting from intermixed and blocked preexposure schedules.
Learn Behav. 2015 Mar;43(1):12-9. doi: 10.3758/s13420-014-0157-7.
8
Brain correlates of experience-dependent changes in stimulus discrimination based on the amount and schedule of exposure.基于暴露量和暴露时间表的刺激辨别中经验依赖性变化的脑关联。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 26;9(6):e101011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101011. eCollection 2014.
9
Elemental representation and configural mappings: combining elemental and configural theories of associative learning.元素表征与构型映射:结合联想学习的元素理论与构型理论
Learn Behav. 2012 Sep;40(3):320-33. doi: 10.3758/s13420-012-0079-1.
10
The dual role of the context in postpeak performance decrements resulting from extended training.情境在长时间训练导致的峰值后表现下降中的双重作用。
Learn Behav. 2012 Dec;40(4):476-93. doi: 10.3758/s13420-012-0068-4.