Kohl Peter, Ravens Ursula
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2003 May-Jul;82(1-3):3-9. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6107(03)00022-1.
Mechanical effects on heart rhythm have been known to the clinical community for well over a century, and documented cases include both arrhythmogenic and pro-rhythmic consequences of mechanical stimulation. The intracardiac pathway that leads from changes in the cardiac mechanical environment to altered electrical activity is referred to as mechano-electric feedback (MEF). Fundamental research into the mechanisms underlying cardiac MEF is 'engineering-intensive', and much of the current insight would have been impossible without the introduction of novel techniques for the study of isolated cardiac cells. Clinical and basic research into MEF have developed over different time scales, often uninformed of each other, and utilizing disparate concepts and terminology. Bridging the gap between the two domains is not straightforward, as physicians and scientists tend to publish in different journals and attend different meetings. There is, however, a growing interest in 're-uniting' the clinic and basic MEF research, as witnessed by an increasing number of dedicated journal issues and international meetings, including events hosted by major European and American professional organisations such as the ESC and NASPE. Last year alone saw an international workshop on Cardiac MEF & Arrhythmias at Oxford, as well as dedicated sessions at NASPE's 23rd annual meeting in San Diego, CardioStim 2002 in Nice, and the UK Physiological Society meeting in Leeds. This volume of Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology incorporates clinical and basic science results, and it is fitting that its publication coincides with a special session on cardiac MEF at the 2003 meeting of NASPE.
心脏节律的机械效应在临床界已为人所知超过一个多世纪,有记录的病例包括机械刺激导致的心律失常和促心律失常后果。从心脏机械环境变化到电活动改变的心脏内途径被称为机械电反馈(MEF)。对心脏MEF潜在机制的基础研究是“工程密集型”的,如果没有引入用于研究分离心脏细胞的新技术,目前的许多见解是不可能获得的。对MEF的临床和基础研究在不同的时间尺度上发展,往往彼此缺乏了解,并且使用不同的概念和术语。弥合这两个领域之间的差距并非易事,因为医生和科学家倾向于在不同的期刊上发表文章并参加不同的会议。然而,对将临床和基础MEF研究“重新结合”的兴趣日益浓厚,越来越多专门的期刊特刊和国际会议就是明证,包括由欧洲和美国主要专业组织如欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)和北美心脏起搏和电生理学会(NASPE)主办的活动。仅去年一年就有在牛津举办的心脏MEF与心律失常国际研讨会,以及在圣地亚哥举行的NASPE第23届年会、在尼斯举行的2002年心脏刺激大会(CardioStim 2002)和在利兹举行的英国生理学会会议上的专门会议。这卷《生物物理学与分子生物学进展》纳入了临床和基础科学成果,其出版恰逢NASPE 2003年会议上关于心脏MEF的特别会议,这是很合适的。