• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性胁迫策略:当男性和女性对“不”的回答置若罔闻时。

Tactics of sexual coercion: when men and women won't take no for an answer.

作者信息

Struckman-Johnson Cindy, Struckman-Johnson David, Anderson Peter B

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD 57069, USA.

出版信息

J Sex Res. 2003 Feb;40(1):76-86. doi: 10.1080/00224490309552168.

DOI:10.1080/00224490309552168
PMID:12806533
Abstract

We investigated women's and men's reports of experiencing and using tactics of postrefusal sexual persistence, defined as persistent attempts to have sexual contact with someone who has already refused. Participants were 275 men and 381 women at Midwestern and Southern universities. More women (78%) than men (58%) reported having been subjected to such tactics since age 16; this difference was significant for the categories of sexual arousal, emotional manipulation and lies, and intoxication, and for two tactics within the physical force category (physical restraint and threats of harm). More men (40%) than women (26%) reported having used such tactics; this difference was significant for the sexual arousal, emotional manipulation and lies, and intoxication categories. We present participants' written descriptions of their experiences.

摘要

我们调查了男性和女性关于经历及使用拒绝后性纠缠策略的报告,该策略被定义为对已拒绝者持续进行性接触的企图。参与者为中西部和南部大学的275名男性和381名女性。自16岁以来,报告称遭受过此类策略的女性(78%)多于男性(58%);在性唤起、情感操控与谎言、醉酒等类别,以及身体暴力类别中的两种策略(身体约束和伤害威胁)方面,这种差异具有显著性。报告称使用过此类策略的男性(40%)多于女性(26%);在性唤起、情感操控与谎言、醉酒等类别方面,这种差异具有显著性。我们展示了参与者对自身经历的书面描述。

相似文献

1
Tactics of sexual coercion: when men and women won't take no for an answer.性胁迫策略:当男性和女性对“不”的回答置若罔闻时。
J Sex Res. 2003 Feb;40(1):76-86. doi: 10.1080/00224490309552168.
2
Gender differences in cognitive and affective responses to sexual coercion.性胁迫对认知和情感反应的性别差异。
J Interpers Violence. 2012 Mar;27(5):827-45. doi: 10.1177/0886260511423250. Epub 2011 Oct 16.
3
Sexual coercion in men and women: similar behaviors, different predictors.男性和女性中的性胁迫:相似的行为,不同的预测因素。
Arch Sex Behav. 2009 Dec;38(6):974-86. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9481-y. Epub 2009 Mar 28.
4
Sexual coercion in intimate relationships: a comparative analysis of the effects of women's infidelity and men's dominance and control.亲密关系中的性胁迫:女性不忠以及男性主导与控制之影响的比较分析
Arch Sex Behav. 2009 Apr;38(2):226-34. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9353-x. Epub 2008 Apr 15.
5
Manipulation and force as sexual coercion tactics: conceptual and empirical differences.作为性胁迫策略的操纵和暴力:概念与实证差异
Aggress Behav. 2007 Jul-Aug;33(4):291-303. doi: 10.1002/ab.20200.
6
Experiences with dating aggression and sexual coercion among Polish college students.波兰大学生的约会攻击和性胁迫经历。
J Interpers Violence. 2008 Jan;23(1):58-73. doi: 10.1177/0886260507307651.
7
Male and female sexual victimization in dating relationships: gender differences in coercion techniques and outcomes.恋爱关系中的男性和女性性侵害:胁迫手段及后果的性别差异
Violence Vict. 1995 Fall;10(3):203-15.
8
Heterosexual experiences of secondary school pupils in Ireland: sexual coercion in context.爱尔兰中学生的异性恋经历:情境中的性胁迫
Cult Health Sex. 2008 Jun;10(5):479-93. doi: 10.1080/13691050801915184.
9
A comparison of sexual coercion experiences reported by men and women in prison.监狱中男性和女性所报告的性胁迫经历比较。
J Interpers Violence. 2006 Dec;21(12):1591-615. doi: 10.1177/0886260506294240.
10
Are all perpetrators alike? Comparing risk factors for sexual coercion and aggression.所有犯罪者都一样吗?比较性胁迫和侵犯的风险因素。
Sex Abuse. 2010 Dec;22(4):402-26. doi: 10.1177/1079063210372140. Epub 2010 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Nonconsensual Sexual Experience Acknowledgment: Exploring the Roles of Gender Identity, Sexual Aggression Myths, and Psychological Inflexibility.非自愿性经历确认:探索性别认同、性侵犯神话和心理僵化的作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 27;15(7):875. doi: 10.3390/bs15070875.
2
Child sexual abuse, adolescent/adult sexual violence, and sexual functioning among college women: a systematic review.儿童性虐待、青少年/成人性暴力与大学女生的性功能:一项系统综述
BMC Glob Public Health. 2024 May 13;2(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s44263-024-00060-7.
3
Women's Experiences of Adult Sexual Assault, by Perpetrator Gender and Participant Sexual Orientation.
按犯罪者性别和参与者性取向划分的成年女性遭受性侵犯的经历
J Interpers Violence. 2025 Oct;40(19-20):4479-4499. doi: 10.1177/08862605241291586. Epub 2024 Nov 16.
4
The Confluence Model of Sexual Aggression in the Context of Acute Intoxication and State Emotion Regulation.急性中毒和状态情绪调节背景下的性侵犯汇流模型。
Violence Vict. 2024 Oct 14;39(5):571-587. doi: 10.1891/VV-2022-0131.
5
Words Can Hurt: A Taxonomy of Verbally Pressured Sexual Exploitation in the SES-V.言语施压型性剥削:SES-V 中的动词分类。
J Sex Res. 2024 Jul;61(6):882-896. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2024.2358414. Epub 2024 Jul 7.
6
Quantifying Criminal Sexual Acts: The Illegal Sexual Exploitation Module of the Revised Sexual Experiences Survey-Victimization (SES-V) Measure.量化犯罪性行为:修订后的性经历调查-受害(SES-V)测量法中的非法性剥削模块。
J Sex Res. 2024 Jul;61(6):868-881. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2024.2359049. Epub 2024 Jul 7.
7
Different Components of Sexual Narcissism Are Differentially Associated With Specific Sexual Aggression Strategies: An Exploratory Study Among Male and Female College Students.性自恋的不同成分与特定性侵犯策略存在不同关联:一项针对男女大学生的探索性研究。
Int J Sex Health. 2024 Feb 8;36(1):111-125. doi: 10.1080/19317611.2024.2311142. eCollection 2024.
8
An Exploratory Study of Sexual Aggression Tactics as a Function of Perpetrator Gender and Victim Gender.一项关于性侵犯策略作为犯罪者性别和受害者性别的函数的探索性研究。
Int J Sex Health. 2022 Mar 29;34(3):397-408. doi: 10.1080/19317611.2022.2053027. eCollection 2022.
9
Sexual Offending: Adverse Childhood Experiences, Shame, and Self-Compassion Explain the Variance in Self-Harm and Harm Towards Others?性犯罪:童年不良经历、羞耻感和自我同情能否解释自我伤害和对他人伤害的差异?
Sex Abuse. 2024 Sep;36(6):662-691. doi: 10.1177/10790632231201398. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
10
Preliminary Efficacy of a Brief Cognitive Restructuring Intervention to Reduce Sexual Coercion Intentions: Roles of Alcohol and Emotion Regulation.简短认知重构干预减少性胁迫意图的初步疗效:酒精和情绪调节的作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2024 Feb;39(3-4):910-920. doi: 10.1177/08862605231197784. Epub 2023 Aug 31.