• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

残疾研究与心理学能携手合作吗?

Can disability studies and psychology join hands?

作者信息

Olkin Rhoda, Pledger Constance

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology, California School of Professional Psychology, Alliant International University, USA.

出版信息

Am Psychol. 2003 Apr;58(4):296-304. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.58.4.296.

DOI:10.1037/0003-066x.58.4.296
PMID:12866396
Abstract

Although the field of disabilities studies incorporates psychology within its interdisciplinary purview, it embodies a distinct perspective consonant with the new paradigm of disability. This perspective is contrasted with that of psychology, and the place of disability within psychology is examined. Although psychology has begun to embrace diversity, disability has remained marginalized. Four areas are presented in this article: (a) the foundational ideas of disability studies, (b) training in disability within psychology, (c) the paradigms of disability reflected in research on disability, and (d) future research directions.

摘要

尽管残疾研究领域将心理学纳入其跨学科范畴,但它体现了一种与新的残疾范式相一致的独特视角。这种视角与心理学的视角形成对比,并审视了残疾在心理学中的地位。尽管心理学已开始接纳多样性,但残疾仍处于边缘地位。本文介绍了四个方面:(a)残疾研究的基础理念,(b)心理学领域内关于残疾的培训,(c)残疾研究中所反映的残疾范式,以及(d)未来的研究方向。

相似文献

1
Can disability studies and psychology join hands?残疾研究与心理学能携手合作吗?
Am Psychol. 2003 Apr;58(4):296-304. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.58.4.296.
2
An integrative conceptual framework of disability. New directions for research.残疾的综合概念框架。研究的新方向。
Am Psychol. 2003 Apr;58(4):289-95. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.58.4.289.
3
Diversity and social justice in disability: The heart and soul of rehabilitation psychology.残疾中的多样性和社会正义:康复心理学的核心与灵魂。
Rehabil Psychol. 2019 May;64(2):105-110. doi: 10.1037/rep0000278.
4
Globalizing rehabilitation psychology: Application of foundational principles to global health and rehabilitation challenges.全球化背景下的康复心理学:基本原则在全球健康与康复挑战中的应用
Rehabil Psychol. 2016 Feb;61(1):65-73. doi: 10.1037/rep0000068.
5
The foundational principles as psychological lodestars: Theoretical inspiration and empirical direction in rehabilitation psychology.作为心理导向之星的基本原则:康复心理学中的理论灵感与实证方向
Rehabil Psychol. 2016 Feb;61(1):1-6. doi: 10.1037/rep0000082.
6
Valuing the insider-professional perspective of disability: A call for rehabilitation psychologists to support disabled psychologists and trainees across the profession.重视残疾的内行-专业视角:呼吁康复心理学家支持整个专业领域的残疾心理学家和学员。
Rehabil Psychol. 2022 Nov;67(4):582-586. doi: 10.1037/rep0000452.
7
Whose ethics, whose code: an analysis of problems in interdisciplinary intervention.谁的伦理,谁的准则:跨学科干预中的问题分析
Ment Retard. 1987 Apr;41(2):113-7.
8
The function of the psychology department in a school for the mentally retarded.一所智障学校中心理学系的作用。
Am J Ment Defic. 1953 Oct;58(2):323-6.
9
RESEARCH ON THE LINGUISTIC PROBLEMS OF THE MENTALLY RETARDED.智障者语言问题研究
Ment Retard Abstr. 1964;40:3-27.
10
AN ANALYSIS OF ATTITUDES OF PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL REGARDING MENTAL RETARDATION AS A FIELD.专业人员对智力障碍这一领域的态度分析。
Ment Hyg. 1964 Jul;48:406-12.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Initial Validation of the Autism and Neurodiversity Attitudes Scale.自闭症与神经多样性态度量表的编制及初步验证
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Feb 5;7(1):39-51. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0090. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Will psychology ever 'join hands' with disability studies? Opportunities and challenges in working towards structurally competent and disability-affirmative psychotherapy for energy limiting conditions.心理学能否与残疾研究“携手合作”?为能量受限状况开展具备结构胜任力和残疾肯定性心理治疗所面临的机遇与挑战。
Med Humanit. 2025 Jan 2;50(4):728-739. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2023-012877.
3
Barriers to mental health service use among people with disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic.
残疾人在 COVID-19 大流行期间获得心理健康服务的障碍。
Rehabil Psychol. 2023 Nov;68(4):351-361. doi: 10.1037/rep0000512. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
4
Language Preferences in the Dutch Autism Community: A Social Psychological Approach.荷兰自闭症群体的语言偏好:一种社会心理学方法。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 May;54(5):1727-1739. doi: 10.1007/s10803-023-05903-0. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
5
Narrative identity among people with disabilities in the United States during the Covid-19 pandemic: The interdependent self.新冠疫情期间美国残疾人的叙事身份:相互依存的自我。
J Res Pers. 2022 Dec;101:104302. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2022.104302. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
6
Guidelines to Address Barriers in Clinical Training for Trainees with Sensory Disabilities.针对有感官障碍学员的临床培训障碍应对指南。
Train Educ Prof Psychol. 2022 Aug;16(3):220-228. doi: 10.1037/tep0000367. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
7
A hidden community: Facial disfigurement as a globally neglected human rights issue.一个被忽视的群体:面部毁容作为一个全球被忽视的人权问题。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2021 Oct-Dec;11(4):652-657. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2021.09.011. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
8
Rasch Analysis of Social Attitude Barriers and Facilitators to Participation for Individuals with Disabilities.残疾人士参与障碍和促进因素的社会态度的罗夏分析。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Apr;102(4):675-686. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.09.390. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
9
Development of self-report measures of social attitudes that act as environmental barriers and facilitators for people with disabilities.开发作为残疾人环境障碍和促进因素的社会态度自我报告测量方法。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Apr;96(4):596-603. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.06.019. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
10
Return-to-work activities in a Chinese cultural context.返回工作活动在中国文化背景下。
J Occup Rehabil. 2011 Mar;21 Suppl 1:S44-54. doi: 10.1007/s10926-010-9272-2.