Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 26;10(11):e044710. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044710.
Advocacy is vital for advancing tobacco control and there has been considerable investment in this area. While much is known about tobacco industry interference (TII), there is little research on advocates' efforts in countering TII and what they need to succeed. We sought to examine this and focused on low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where adoption and implementation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) tend to remain slower and weaker.
We interviewed 22 advocates from eight LMICs with recent progress in a tobacco control policy. We explored participants' experiences in countering TII, including the activities they undertake, challenges they encounter and how their efforts could be enhanced. We used Qualitative Description to analyse transcripts and validated findings through participant feedback.
We identified four main areas of countering activities: (1) generating and compiling data and evidence, (2) accessing policymakers and restricting industry access, (3) working with media and (4) engaging in a national coalition. Each area was linked to challenges, including (1) lack of data, (2) no/weak implementation of FCTC Article 5.3, (3) industry ties with media professionals and (4) advocates' limited capacity. To address these challenges, participants suggested initiatives, including access to country-specific data, building advocates' skills in compiling and using such data in research and monitoring, and in coalition development; others aiming at training journalists to question and investigate TII; and finally, diverse interventions intended to advance a whole-of-government approach to tobacco control. Structural changes to tobacco control funding and coordination were suggested to facilitate the proposed measures.
This research highlights that following years of investment in tobacco control in LMICs, there is growing confidence in addressing TII. We identify straightforward initiatives that could strengthen such efforts. This research also underscores that more structural changes to enhance tobacco control capacity building should be considered.
倡导对于推进烟草控制至关重要,并且在这一领域已经进行了大量投资。虽然人们对烟草业干扰(TII)了解颇多,但对于倡导者在对抗 TII 方面所做的努力以及他们取得成功所需的条件却知之甚少。我们试图对此进行研究,并将重点放在在采用和实施《烟草控制框架公约》(FCTC)方面往往较为缓慢和薄弱的低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)。
我们采访了来自八个在烟草控制政策方面取得近期进展的 LMIC 的 22 名倡导者。我们探讨了参与者在对抗 TII 方面的经验,包括他们所从事的活动、遇到的挑战以及如何加强他们的努力。我们使用定性描述来分析转录本,并通过参与者的反馈验证研究结果。
我们确定了对抗活动的四个主要领域:(1)生成和编译数据和证据,(2)接近决策者并限制行业准入,(3)与媒体合作,以及(4)参与国家联盟。每个领域都与挑战相关联,包括(1)缺乏数据,(2)未/弱执行 FCTC 第 5.3 条,(3)行业与媒体专业人士的联系,以及(4)倡导者能力有限。为了应对这些挑战,参与者提出了一些倡议,包括获取针对特定国家的数据、培养倡导者在研究和监测中编译和使用此类数据的技能,并在联盟发展方面;其他倡议旨在培训记者质疑和调查 TII;最后,提出了各种干预措施,旨在推进烟草控制的全政府方法。建议对烟草控制资金和协调进行结构性改革,以促进拟议措施。
这项研究表明,在 LMIC 进行了多年的烟草控制投资之后,人们对处理 TII 的信心日益增强。我们确定了一些可以加强此类努力的简单举措。这项研究还强调,应考虑进行更多的结构性改革,以加强烟草控制能力建设。