Terracciano Antonio, McCrae Robert R, Hagemann Dirk, Costa Paul T
Laboratory of Personality and Cognition, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, MD 21224-6825, USA.
J Pers. 2003 Oct;71(5):669-703. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.7105001.
Methodological arguments are usually invoked to explain variations in the structure of affect. Using self-rated affect from Italian samples (N=600), we show that individual difference variables related to affective differentiation can moderate the observed structure. Indices of circumplexity and congruence coefficients to the hypothesized target were used to quantify the observed structures. Results did not support the circumplex model as a universal structure. A circular structure with axes of activation and valence was approximated only among more affectively differentiated groups: students and respondents with high scores on Openness to Feelings and measures of negative emotionality. A different structure, with unipolar Positive Affect and Negative Affect factors, was observed among adults and respondents with low Openness to Feelings and negative emotionality. The observed structure of affect will depend in part on the nature of the sample studied.
通常会援引方法论论据来解释情感结构的差异。我们使用来自意大利样本(N = 600)的自评情感,表明与情感分化相关的个体差异变量可以调节观察到的结构。使用环形复杂度指数和与假设目标的一致性系数来量化观察到的结构。结果并不支持环形模型作为一种通用结构。只有在情感分化程度更高的群体中,即开放性得分高的学生和被试以及负性情绪测量得分高的群体中,才近似出现具有激活轴和效价轴的圆形结构。在成年人以及开放性得分低和负性情绪得分低的被试中,观察到的是具有单极积极情感和消极情感因素的不同结构。观察到的情感结构将部分取决于所研究样本的性质。