《大五人格量表（NEO PI-R）意大利语版：针对性旋转使用的概念与实证支持》
The Italian version of the NEO PI-R: Conceptual and empirical support for the use of targeted rotation.
作者信息
Terracciano Antonio
机构信息
National Institute on Aging, NIH.
出版信息
Pers Individ Dif. 2003;35(8):1859-1872. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00035-7.
Abstract
Earlier cross-cultural research on replicability of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) suggested that personality trait structure is universal, but a recent study using an Italian translation has challenged this position. The present article reexamines the psychometric properties of the Italian NEO-PI-R and discusses the importance of orthogonal Procrustes rotation when the replicability of complex factor structures is tested. The arguments are supported by data from a slightly modified translation of the NEO-PI-R, which was administered to 575 Italian subjects. These data show a close replication of the American normative factor structure when targeted rotation is used. Further, the validity of the Italian NEO-PI-R is supported by external correlates, such as demographic variables (age, sex, education), depression, and affect scales.
摘要
早期关于修订版大五人格量表（NEO-PI-R）可重复性的跨文化研究表明，人格特质结构具有普遍性，但最近一项使用意大利语翻译版本的研究对这一观点提出了挑战。本文重新审视了意大利语版NEO-PI-R的心理测量特性，并讨论了在测试复杂因素结构的可重复性时进行正交普罗克汝斯旋转的重要性。这些观点得到了对NEO-PI-R进行轻微修改后的翻译版本的数据支持，该版本施测于575名意大利受试者。这些数据表明，当使用目标旋转时，意大利语版与美国常模因素结构高度相似。此外，意大利语版NEO-PI-R的效度得到了外部相关因素的支持，如人口统计学变量（年龄、性别、教育程度）、抑郁和情感量表。
相似文献
1
The Italian version of the NEO PI-R: Conceptual and empirical support for the use of targeted rotation.《大五人格量表（NEO PI-R）意大利语版：针对性旋转使用的概念与实证支持》
Pers Individ Dif. 2003;35(8):1859-1872. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00035-7.
2
Cross-cultural replication of the five-factor model and comparison of the NEO-PI-R and MMPI-2 PSY-5 scales in a Dutch psychiatric sample.五因素模型的跨文化复制以及荷兰精神病样本中NEO-PI-R和MMPI-2 PSY-5量表的比较。
Psychol Assess. 2003 Mar;15(1):81-8. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.15.1.81.
3
Assessing the universal structure of personality in early adolescence: The NEO-PI-R and NEO-PI-3 in 24 cultures.评估青少年早期人格的普遍结构：24种文化中的NEO-PI-R和NEO-PI-3。
Assessment. 2009 Sep;16(3):301-11. doi: 10.1177/1073191109333760. Epub 2009 May 5.
4
Standardization of the NEO-PI-3 in the Greek general population.希腊普通人群中NEO-PI-3的标准化
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2014 Dec 5;13(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12991-014-0036-9. eCollection 2014.
5
[Does the French Big Five Inventory evaluate facets other than the Big Five factors?].[法国大五人格量表是否评估了大五人格因素以外的其他方面？]
Encephale. 2018 Jun;44(3):208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
6
[Validation of the French version of the 10-item Big Five Inventory].[10 项大五人格量表法语版的验证]
Encephale. 2020 Dec;46(6):455-462. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
7
Thinking styles in relation to personality traits: an investigation of the Thinking Styles Inventory and NEO-PI-R.与人格特质相关的思维方式：思维方式量表与大五人格量表的调查研究
Scand J Psychol. 2004 Sep;45(4):293-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2004.00408.x.
8
Psychometric evaluation of responses to the NEO-PI-3 in a multi-ethnic sample of adults in India.
Psychol Assess. 2015 Dec;27(4):1253-63. doi: 10.1037/pas0000135. Epub 2015 May 4.
9
[Junior version of the Spanish NEO PI-R (JS NEO)].[西班牙NEO PI-R青少年版（JS NEO）]
Psicothema. 2007 May;19(2):263-8.
10
Rotation to Maximize the Construct Validity of Factors in the NEO Personality Inventory.旋转最大化 NEO 人格量表中因素的结构效度。
Multivariate Behav Res. 1989 Jan 1;24(1):107-24. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2401_7.
引用本文的文献
1
Resilience Phenotypes and Psychological Functioning among Individuals with Opioid Use Disorder.阿片类药物使用障碍个体的韧性表型与心理功能。
Subst Use Misuse. 2024;59(1):41-49. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2023.2259450. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
2
Personality traits are consistently associated with blood mitochondrial DNA copy number estimated from genome sequences in two genetic cohort studies.人格特质与从两个遗传队列研究的基因组序列中估计的血液线粒体 DNA 拷贝数始终相关。
Elife. 2022 Dec 20;11:e77806. doi: 10.7554/eLife.77806.
3
Group Imagery Rescripting on Childhood Memories Delivered Telehealth: A Preliminary Study.通过远程医疗进行的童年记忆群体意象重编：一项初步研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 23;13:862289. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.862289. eCollection 2022.
4
Facets of Personality and Risk of Cognitive Impairment: Longitudinal Findings in a Rural Community from Sardinia.人格特质与认知障碍风险的关联：撒丁岛农村社区的纵向研究结果。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;88(4):1651-1661. doi: 10.3233/JAD-220400.
5
Time-resolved connectome of the five-factor model of personality.人格五因素模型的时分辨接组图谱。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 21;9(1):15066. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51469-2.
6
Intra-cortical myelin mediates personality differences.皮质内髓鞘介导人格差异。
J Pers. 2019 Aug;87(4):889-902. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12442. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
7
Functional connectome of the five-factor model of personality.人格五因素模型的功能连接组
Personal Neurosci. 2018;1. doi: 10.1017/pen.2017.2. Epub 2018 May 25.
8
Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Neuroticism Subscale of the NEO-PI.NEO人格量表神经质分量表中文版的心理测量学特性
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 17;9:1454. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01454. eCollection 2018.
9
Personality traits and facets linked with self-reported alcohol consumption and biomarkers of liver health.人格特质和方面与自我报告的酒精摄入量和肝脏健康生物标志物相关。
Addict Behav. 2018 Jul;82:135-141. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.02.034. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
10
Increased cerebellar gray matter volume in head chefs.主厨的小脑灰质体积增加。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 9;12(2):e0171457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171457. eCollection 2017.
本文引用的文献
1
Factorial and construct validity of the Italian Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS).意大利积极和消极情绪量表（PANAS）的效标效度和结构效度。
Eur J Psychol Assess. 2003;19(2):131-141. doi: 10.1027//1015-5759.19.2.131.
2
Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings.跨文化背景下人格特质的性别差异：确凿且惊人的发现。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Aug;81(2):322-331. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.322.
3
Sources of structure: genetic, environmental, and artifactual influences on the covariation of personality traits.结构的来源：基因、环境及人为因素对人格特质协变的影响
J Pers. 2001 Aug;69(4):511-35. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.694154.
4
Age differences in personality across the adult life span: parallels in five cultures.成年期人格的年龄差异：五种文化中的相似之处
Dev Psychol. 1999 Mar;35(2):466-77. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.35.2.466.
5
A psychobiological model of temperament and character.气质与性格的心理生物学模型。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993 Dec;50(12):975-90. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820240059008.
6
Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: happy and unhappy people.外向性和神经质对主观幸福感的影响：快乐的人和不快乐的人。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980 Apr;38(4):668-78. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.38.4.668.
7
Assessing depressive symptoms across cultures: Italian validation of the CES-D self-rating scale.跨文化评估抑郁症状：CES-D自评量表的意大利语验证
J Clin Psychol. 1983 Mar;39(2):249-51. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198303)39:2<249::aid-jclp2270390218>3.0.co;2-y.
8
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales.积极和消极情绪简短测量方法的编制与验证：PANAS量表
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063.
9
The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins's circumplex and the five-factor model.人际特质的结构：威金斯的环形模型与五因素模型
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Apr;56(4):586-95. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.56.4.586.
10
On traits and temperament: general and specific factors of emotional experience and their relation to the five-factor model.论特质与气质：情绪体验的一般因素和特殊因素及其与五因素模型的关系
J Pers. 1992 Jun;60(2):441-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00980.x.
Zotero 插件