《大五人格量表（NEO PI-R）意大利语版：针对性旋转使用的概念与实证支持》
The Italian version of the NEO PI-R: Conceptual and empirical support for the use of targeted rotation.
作者信息
Terracciano Antonio
机构信息
National Institute on Aging, NIH.
出版信息
Pers Individ Dif. 2003;35(8):1859-1872. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00035-7.
Abstract
Earlier cross-cultural research on replicability of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) suggested that personality trait structure is universal, but a recent study using an Italian translation has challenged this position. The present article reexamines the psychometric properties of the Italian NEO-PI-R and discusses the importance of orthogonal Procrustes rotation when the replicability of complex factor structures is tested. The arguments are supported by data from a slightly modified translation of the NEO-PI-R, which was administered to 575 Italian subjects. These data show a close replication of the American normative factor structure when targeted rotation is used. Further, the validity of the Italian NEO-PI-R is supported by external correlates, such as demographic variables (age, sex, education), depression, and affect scales.
摘要
早期关于修订版大五人格量表（NEO-PI-R）可重复性的跨文化研究表明，人格特质结构具有普遍性，但最近一项使用意大利语翻译版本的研究对这一观点提出了挑战。本文重新审视了意大利语版NEO-PI-R的心理测量特性，并讨论了在测试复杂因素结构的可重复性时进行正交普罗克汝斯旋转的重要性。这些观点得到了对NEO-PI-R进行轻微修改后的翻译版本的数据支持，该版本施测于575名意大利受试者。这些数据表明，当使用目标旋转时，意大利语版与美国常模因素结构高度相似。此外，意大利语版NEO-PI-R的效度得到了外部相关因素的支持，如人口统计学变量（年龄、性别、教育程度）、抑郁和情感量表。
相似文献
1
The Italian version of the NEO PI-R: Conceptual and empirical support for the use of targeted rotation.
Pers Individ Dif. 2003;35(8):1859-1872. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00035-7.
2
Cross-cultural replication of the five-factor model and comparison of the NEO-PI-R and MMPI-2 PSY-5 scales in a Dutch psychiatric sample.
Psychol Assess. 2003 Mar;15(1):81-8. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.15.1.81.
3
Assessing the universal structure of personality in early adolescence: The NEO-PI-R and NEO-PI-3 in 24 cultures.
Assessment. 2009 Sep;16(3):301-11. doi: 10.1177/1073191109333760. Epub 2009 May 5.
4
Standardization of the NEO-PI-3 in the Greek general population.
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2014 Dec 5;13(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12991-014-0036-9. eCollection 2014.
5
[Does the French Big Five Inventory evaluate facets other than the Big Five factors?].
Encephale. 2018 Jun;44(3):208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
6
[Validation of the French version of the 10-item Big Five Inventory].
Encephale. 2020 Dec;46(6):455-462. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
7
Thinking styles in relation to personality traits: an investigation of the Thinking Styles Inventory and NEO-PI-R.
Scand J Psychol. 2004 Sep;45(4):293-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2004.00408.x.
8
Psychometric evaluation of responses to the NEO-PI-3 in a multi-ethnic sample of adults in India.
Psychol Assess. 2015 Dec;27(4):1253-63. doi: 10.1037/pas0000135. Epub 2015 May 4.
9
[Junior version of the Spanish NEO PI-R (JS NEO)].
Psicothema. 2007 May;19(2):263-8.
10
Rotation to Maximize the Construct Validity of Factors in the NEO Personality Inventory.
Multivariate Behav Res. 1989 Jan 1;24(1):107-24. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2401_7.
引用本文的文献
1
Resilience Phenotypes and Psychological Functioning among Individuals with Opioid Use Disorder.
Subst Use Misuse. 2024;59(1):41-49. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2023.2259450. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
2
Personality traits are consistently associated with blood mitochondrial DNA copy number estimated from genome sequences in two genetic cohort studies.
Elife. 2022 Dec 20;11:e77806. doi: 10.7554/eLife.77806.
3
Group Imagery Rescripting on Childhood Memories Delivered Telehealth: A Preliminary Study.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 23;13:862289. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.862289. eCollection 2022.
4
Facets of Personality and Risk of Cognitive Impairment: Longitudinal Findings in a Rural Community from Sardinia.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;88(4):1651-1661. doi: 10.3233/JAD-220400.
5
Time-resolved connectome of the five-factor model of personality.
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 21;9(1):15066. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51469-2.
6
Intra-cortical myelin mediates personality differences.
J Pers. 2019 Aug;87(4):889-902. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12442. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
7
Functional connectome of the five-factor model of personality.
Personal Neurosci. 2018;1. doi: 10.1017/pen.2017.2. Epub 2018 May 25.
8
Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Neuroticism Subscale of the NEO-PI.
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 17;9:1454. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01454. eCollection 2018.
9
Personality traits and facets linked with self-reported alcohol consumption and biomarkers of liver health.
Addict Behav. 2018 Jul;82:135-141. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.02.034. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
10
Increased cerebellar gray matter volume in head chefs.
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 9;12(2):e0171457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171457. eCollection 2017.
本文引用的文献
1
Factorial and construct validity of the Italian Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS).
Eur J Psychol Assess. 2003;19(2):131-141. doi: 10.1027//1015-5759.19.2.131.
2
Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Aug;81(2):322-331. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.322.
3
Sources of structure: genetic, environmental, and artifactual influences on the covariation of personality traits.
J Pers. 2001 Aug;69(4):511-35. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.694154.
4
Age differences in personality across the adult life span: parallels in five cultures.
Dev Psychol. 1999 Mar;35(2):466-77. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.35.2.466.
5
A psychobiological model of temperament and character.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993 Dec;50(12):975-90. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820240059008.
6
Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: happy and unhappy people.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980 Apr;38(4):668-78. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.38.4.668.
7
Assessing depressive symptoms across cultures: Italian validation of the CES-D self-rating scale.
J Clin Psychol. 1983 Mar;39(2):249-51. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198303)39:2<249::aid-jclp2270390218>3.0.co;2-y.
8
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063.
9
The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins's circumplex and the five-factor model.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Apr;56(4):586-95. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.56.4.586.
10
On traits and temperament: general and specific factors of emotional experience and their relation to the five-factor model.
J Pers. 1992 Jun;60(2):441-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00980.x.
Zotero 插件