Völker Juliane
Department of Psychology, University of Trier, D-54296 Trier, Germany.
J Intell. 2020 Apr 24;8(2):18. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence8020018.
This study investigated correlative, factorial, and structural relationships between scores for ability emotional intelligence in the workplace (measured with the Geneva Emotional Competence Test), as well as fluid and crystallized abilities (measured with the Intelligence Structure Battery), carried out by a 188-participant student sample. Confirming existing research, recognition, understanding, and management of emotions were related primarily to crystallized ability tests measuring general knowledge, verbal fluency, and knowledge of word meaning. Meanwhile, emotion regulation was the least correlated with any other cognitive or emotional ability. In line with research on the trainability of emotional intelligence, these results may support the notion that emotional abilities are subject to acquired knowledge, where situational (i.e., workplace-specific) emotional intelligence may depend on accumulating relevant experiences.
本研究调查了188名学生样本在工作场所的能力型情商得分(通过日内瓦情绪能力测试衡量)与流体智力和晶体智力(通过智力结构测验衡量)之间的相关关系、因子关系和结构关系。与现有研究一致,情绪的识别、理解和管理主要与衡量常识、语言流畅性和词义知识的晶体能力测试相关。同时,情绪调节与其他任何认知或情绪能力的相关性最小。与情商可训练性的研究一致,这些结果可能支持这样一种观点,即情绪能力取决于后天获得的知识,其中情境性(即特定于工作场所的)情商可能依赖于积累相关经验。