• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生不应与绝症患者讨论心肺复苏术：反对。

Doctors should not discuss resuscitation with terminally ill patients: AGAINST.

作者信息

Higginson Irene J

机构信息

Department of Palliative Care and Policy, King's College London, Weston Education Centre, London SE5 9RJ. irene.higginson@ kcl.ac.uk

出版信息

BMJ. 2003 Sep 13;327(7415):615-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7415.615.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.327.7415.615
PMID:12969935
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC194098/
Abstract

Doctors in Britain are expected to attempt resuscitation unless patients have agreed do not resuscitate orders. If patients are terminally ill, is discussion of such orders harmful or helpful?

摘要

在英国，除非患者已签署“不要复苏”指令，否则医生都应尝试进行复苏抢救。对于身患绝症的患者而言，讨论此类指令是有害还是有益呢？

相似文献

1
Doctors should not discuss resuscitation with terminally ill patients: AGAINST.医生不应与绝症患者讨论心肺复苏术：反对。
BMJ. 2003 Sep 13;327(7415):615-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7415.615.
2
Doctors should not discuss resuscitation with terminally ill patients: FOR.医生不应与绝症患者讨论心肺复苏术：支持方观点。
BMJ. 2003 Sep 13;327(7415):614-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7415.614.
3
Paper shields: why advance directives still don't work.书面声明：为何预先医疗指示仍未起作用
Princet J Bioeth. 1998 Spring;1(1):42-57.
4
Decision-making by default: experiences of physicians and nurses with dying patients in intensive care.默认情况下的决策：重症监护中医生和护士对临终患者的经历
Hum Health Care Int. 1996 Nov;12(4):168-72.
5
Never say die?--as treatments fail doctors' words must not.永不言弃？——即便治疗失败，医生的话也绝不能如此。
Int J Clin Pract. 2011 Feb;65(2):117-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02585.x. Epub 2010 Dec 6.
6
Determining resuscitation preferences of elderly inpatients: a review of the literature.确定老年住院患者的复苏偏好：文献综述
CMAJ. 2003 Oct 14;169(8):795-9.
7
Preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation.心肺复苏的偏好。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2003 Sep-Oct;4(5):283. doi: 10.1097/01.JAM.0000085802.47929.83.
8
What investigations and procedures do patients in hospices want. Doctors are under no legal obligation to provide ineffective treatment.临终关怀机构的患者希望进行哪些检查和程序？医生没有法律义务提供无效的治疗。
BMJ. 1998 Apr 11;316(7138):1167.
9
Death wish: resuscitating self-determination for the critically ill.死亡愿望：恢复重症患者的自主决定权
Ariz Law Rev. 1993 Spring;35(1):23-85.
10
Factors that influence decisions about cardiopulmonary resuscitation: the views of doctors and medical students.影响心肺复苏决策的因素：医生和医学生的观点。
Postgrad Med J. 2009 Nov;85(1009):564-8. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2009.079491.

引用本文的文献

1
Discussing patient preferences for levels of life-sustaining treatment: development and pilot testing of a Danish POLST form.探讨患者对维持生命治疗水平的偏好：丹麦 POLST 表单的制定和初步测试。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Jan 11;21(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00892-2.
2
An audit of "do not attempt resuscitation" decisions in two district general hospitals: do current guidelines need changing?对两家区综合医院“不进行心肺复苏”决策的审计：现行指南是否需要修改？
Postgrad Med J. 2007 Feb;83(976):137-40. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2006.050260.
3
Decisions at the end of life: an empirical study on the involvement, legal understanding and ethical views of preregistration house officers.临终决策：关于预注册住院医师的参与情况、法律理解及伦理观点的实证研究
J Med Ethics. 2006 Oct;32(10):567-70. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.013904.
4
"Right to die": legal view of right to life and death could threaten philosophy of palliative care.“死亡权利”：关于生死权利的法律观点可能会威胁到姑息治疗理念。
BMJ. 2005 Jun 11;330(7504):1388; discussion 1389. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7504.1388.
5
Discussing end-of-life issues with terminally ill cancer patients and their carers: a qualitative study.与晚期癌症患者及其护理人员讨论临终问题：一项定性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2005 Aug;13(8):589-99. doi: 10.1007/s00520-004-0759-2. Epub 2005 Jan 12.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review of physicians' survival predictions in terminally ill cancer patients.对晚期癌症患者医生生存预测的系统评价。
BMJ. 2003 Jul 26;327(7408):195-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7408.195.
2
'If only someone had told me . . .' A review of the care of patients dying in hospital.“要是有人早告诉我……” 对在医院死亡患者护理情况的回顾。
Clin Med (Lond). 2003 Mar-Apr;3(2):149-52. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.3-2-149.
3
Quality of life of Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) patients: how good are physicians in assessing DNR patients' quality of life?不进行心肺复苏（DNR）患者的生活质量：医生在评估DNR患者生活质量方面的能力如何？
Swiss Med Wkly. 2002 Nov 2;132(39-40):562-5. doi: 10.4414/smw.2002.10083.
4
Communication, information and support for adults with malignant cerebral glioma : a systematic literature review.针对患有恶性脑胶质瘤的成年人的沟通、信息与支持：一项系统的文献综述
Support Care Cancer. 2003 Jan;11(1):21-9. doi: 10.1007/s00520-002-0392-x. Epub 2002 Sep 5.
5
Truth may hurt but deceit hurts more: communication in palliative care.真相或许伤人，但欺骗更伤人：姑息治疗中的沟通
Palliat Med. 2002 Jul;16(4):297-303. doi: 10.1191/0269216302pm575oa.
6
Accounts of carers' satisfaction with health care at the end of life: a comparison of first generation black Caribbeans and white patients with advanced disease.对临终关怀中护理人员满意度的描述：第一代加勒比黑人与晚期疾病白人患者的比较。
Palliat Med. 2001 Jul;15(4):337-45. doi: 10.1191/026921601678320322.
7
Randomised controlled trial of an interactive multimedia decision aid on benign prostatic hypertrophy in primary care.初级保健中良性前列腺增生症交互式多媒体决策辅助工具的随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2001 Sep 1;323(7311):493-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7311.493.
8
Preparing for the end of life: preferences of patients, families, physicians, and other care providers.为生命末期做准备：患者、家属、医生及其他护理人员的偏好
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001 Sep;22(3):727-37. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(01)00334-7.
9
Preferences for chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: descriptive study based on scripted interviews.晚期非小细胞肺癌患者对化疗的偏好：基于脚本访谈的描述性研究
BMJ. 1998 Sep 19;317(7161):771-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7161.771.
10
Role of written advance directives in decision making: insights from qualitative and quantitative data.书面预先指示在决策中的作用：来自定性和定量数据的见解
J Gen Intern Med. 1998 Jul;13(7):439-46. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00132.x.