Wetterhall S F, Pappaioanou M, Thacker S B, Eaker E, Churchill R E
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1992 Dec;41 Suppl:207-18.
Public health surveillance can provide the quantitative information needed for setting priorities and establishing rational health policy. Although there are many examples of the effective use of such information, the full potential for surveillance has not yet been realized. To a large degree, failure to achieve this potential has resulted from limited perspectives regarding the role and conduct of surveillance. Both practitioners (those who conduct surveillance) and users (those who apply surveillance data in a real-world setting) have fallen victim to such myopia. Public health surveillance must be advocated as an essential part of the global health agenda if we are to achieve international goals for improving health status. As we improve our appreciation of the variety of uses for public health surveillance data, we need to understand more fully the determinants of the decision-making process. Effective dissemination of information and effective communication are as important as data collection and analysis. No longer do we have--or should we have--the luxury of collecting information for its own sake. The information collected must have a demonstrated utility. Developing and training personnel to have expertise in public health surveillance will necessarily incur opportunity costs. Bridging gaps in data methodology and coverage will force us to weigh alternatives and to compromise. We hope that the International Symposium on Public Health Surveillance will accomplish several goals. First, we wish to foster international understanding of the definition, role, and importance of surveillance in reducing morbidity and mortality, in improving quality of life, and in setting effective health priorities. Second, we hope that this symposium will serve as a springboard for identifying issues and topics that can be addressed in greater depth at future international meetings. Finally, we see the symposium as an essential step in developing a firm commitment on the part of countries, donor agencies, and multilateral organizations to develop the essential capacity for public health surveillance throughout the world. Each country should have the capacity to measure and monitor changes in health status, risk factors, and health-service access and utilization among its people. All countries should have the means to detect emerging health problems and implement measures for their control, to evaluate the impact of health policies and programs, and to communicate health information in a meaningful fashion to policymakers and the public. If we are successful in these endeavors, the long-term effects on the public's health will be well worth the struggle required to achieve them.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
公共卫生监测能够提供确定工作重点和制定合理卫生政策所需的量化信息。尽管有许多有效利用此类信息的实例,但监测的全部潜力尚未实现。在很大程度上,未能发挥这种潜力是由于对监测的作用和实施的认识有限。从业者(进行监测的人员)和使用者(在实际环境中应用监测数据的人员)都深受这种短视之害。如果我们要实现改善健康状况的国际目标,就必须倡导将公共卫生监测作为全球卫生议程的重要组成部分。随着我们更加认识到公共卫生监测数据的各种用途,我们需要更全面地了解决策过程的决定因素。有效的信息传播和沟通与数据收集和分析同样重要。我们再也不能——也不应该——只为收集信息而收集信息了。所收集的信息必须具有已证明的效用。培养和培训具有公共卫生监测专业知识的人员必然会产生机会成本。弥合数据方法和覆盖范围方面的差距将迫使我们权衡各种选择并做出妥协。我们希望公共卫生监测国际研讨会能够实现几个目标。首先,我们希望促进国际社会对监测在降低发病率和死亡率、改善生活质量以及确定有效的卫生工作重点方面的定义、作用和重要性的理解。其次,我们希望本次研讨会能够成为一个跳板,以确定可在未来国际会议上更深入探讨的问题和主题。最后,我们认为本次研讨会是各国、捐助机构和多边组织坚定承诺在全球发展公共卫生监测基本能力的关键一步。每个国家都应具备测量和监测其人民健康状况、风险因素以及卫生服务可及性和利用情况变化的能力。所有国家都应拥有检测新出现的健康问题并实施控制措施、评估卫生政策和计划的影响以及以有意义的方式向政策制定者和公众传播健康信息的手段。如果我们在这些努力中取得成功,对公众健康的长期影响将非常值得为实现这些目标而付出的努力。(摘要截选至400字)