Hanssler L, Breukmann H
Zentrum für Kinderheilkunde am Universitätsklinikum GHS Essen.
Klin Padiatr. 1992 Sep-Oct;204(5):355-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1025371.
In a group of 6 premature infants, mean weight 1776 g, we measured skin surface temperatures, comparing infrared telethermography (San-ei Thermo-Tracer 6T62) and conventional skin thermometry (Eidatherm). Surface temperatures were measured at 10 different sites, with the infants nursed in an incubator. The same methods were used to compare temperatures on the lower arm of an adult. The results of the two different techniques showed only minor differences of approximately 0,2 degrees C. These discrepancies could be explained by problems of either method. They could also be attributed to the fact, that the emissivity of human skin is not exactly identical with the emissivity of a perfect black body. In clinical practice, infrared thermography and conductive thermometry can be used for determinations of body surface temperature of premature infants, also under the condition of high temperatures and high humidity within an incubator.
在一组6名平均体重为1776克的早产儿中，我们测量了皮肤表面温度，比较了红外热成像法（日本三荣Thermo-Tracer 6T62）和传统皮肤测温法（Eidatherm）。在婴儿置于保温箱中护理的情况下，于10个不同部位测量表面温度。采用相同方法比较了一名成年人下臂的温度。两种不同技术的结果显示仅存在约0.2摄氏度的微小差异。这些差异可能是由两种方法中的问题所致。它们也可能归因于人体皮肤的发射率与理想黑体的发射率并不完全相同这一事实。在临床实践中，红外热成像法和传导测温法可用于测定早产儿的体表温度，即便在保温箱内高温高湿的条件下也是如此。
