Scieux C, Bianchi A, Henry S, Brunat N, Abdennader S, Vexiau D, Janier M, Morel P, Lagrange P H
Laboratoire de Bactériologie-Virologie, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Université Paris VII, France.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Aug;11(8):704-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01989974.
A chemiluminometric immunoassay (Magic Lite Chlamydia) for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigens in first-void urine samples was compared with cell culture using urogenital swabs from 221 men and 242 women. The rate of isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis was 23.5% in men, nearly 80% of whom had symptoms of urethritis, and 8.3% in women, in whom both cervix and urethra samples were tested. In urine sediments from men and women respectively the chemiluminometric assay showed a sensitivity of 80.8% and 70%, a specificity of 97% and 95%, a positive predictive value of 89.4% and 58.3%, and a negative predictive value of 94.3% and 97.2%. Discrepancies between results obtained with the chemiluminometric assay and cell culture were resolved using two polymerase chain reaction techniques to test urogenital samples. The detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine samples with the chemiluminometric assay was confirmed to be superior for screening symptomatic men with urogenital infections than women as a lower prevalence population.
采用化学发光免疫分析法(Magic Lite衣原体检测法)检测首次晨尿样本中的沙眼衣原体抗原,并与细胞培养法进行比较,研究对象为221名男性和242名女性的泌尿生殖拭子样本。男性沙眼衣原体分离率为23.5%,其中近80%有尿道炎症状;女性分离率为8.3%,对其宫颈和尿道样本均进行了检测。化学发光分析法在男性和女性尿沉渣中的敏感性分别为80.8%和70%,特异性分别为97%和95%,阳性预测值分别为89.4%和58.3%,阴性预测值分别为94.3%和97.2%。使用两种聚合酶链反应技术检测泌尿生殖样本,解决了化学发光分析法与细胞培养法结果之间的差异。对于筛查有泌尿生殖系统感染症状的男性,化学发光分析法检测尿样中的沙眼衣原体被证实优于女性,因为女性是患病率较低的人群。