Tarkiainen A, Liljeström M, Seppä M, Salmelin R
Brain Research Unit, Low Temperature Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology, P.O. Box 2200, 02015 HUT, Espoo, Finland.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Oct;114(10):1977-92. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(03)00195-0.
To evaluate the effect that different head conductor models have on the source estimation accuracy of magnetoencephalography (MEG) under realistic conditions.
Magnetic fields evoked by current dipoles were simulated using a highly refined 3-layer realistically shaped conductor model. Noise from a real MEG measurement was added to the simulated fields. Source parameters (location, strength, orientation) were estimated from the noisy signals using 3 spherically symmetric models and several one- and 3-layer realistically shaped boundary-element models. The effect of different measurement sensors (gradiometers, magnetometers) was also tested.
The noise typically present in brain signals masked the errors due to the different conductor models so that in most situations the models gave comparable results. Active cortical areas around the vertex and in the temporal, frontoparietal, and occipital regions were typically found with 2-4 mm accuracy, whereas source localization in several anterior frontal lobe and deep brain structures yielded errors exceeding 2 cm. Localization in anterior frontal regions may benefit most from the use of realistically shaped models.
The traditionally used sphere model is an adequate model for most research purposes. Any means that increase the signal-to-noise ratio are of highest importance in attempting to improve the source estimation accuracy.
评估在实际条件下不同头部导体模型对脑磁图(MEG)源估计准确性的影响。
使用高度精细的三层真实形状导体模型模拟电流偶极子诱发的磁场。将实际MEG测量中的噪声添加到模拟场中。使用3种球对称模型以及几种单层和三层真实形状边界元模型从噪声信号中估计源参数(位置、强度、方向)。还测试了不同测量传感器(梯度计、磁力计)的影响。
脑信号中通常存在的噪声掩盖了由于不同导体模型导致的误差,因此在大多数情况下,这些模型给出了可比的结果。顶点周围以及颞叶、额顶叶和枕叶区域的活跃皮质区域通常以2 - 4毫米的精度被发现,而在几个前额叶和深部脑结构中的源定位误差超过2厘米。在前额叶区域的定位可能从使用真实形状模型中受益最大。
传统使用的球体模型对于大多数研究目的来说是一个足够的模型。在试图提高源估计准确性时,任何提高信噪比的方法都至关重要。