• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作场所安全绩效:尽责性、认知失误及其相互作用。

Workplace safety performance: conscientiousness, cognitive failure, and their interaction.

作者信息

Wallace J Craig, Vodanovich Stephen J

机构信息

Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Psychology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0170, USA.

出版信息

J Occup Health Psychol. 2003 Oct;8(4):316-27. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.8.4.316.

DOI:10.1037/1076-8998.8.4.316
PMID:14570526
Abstract

This research investigated the effects of cognitive failure on workplace safety and accidents over 2 studies. It was hypothesized that cognitive failure would directly predict safety behavior and workplace accidents and predict these outcomes over and above conscientiousness. It was found that cognitive failure uniquely accounted for workplace safety behavior and accidents. However, it has been suggested by researchers that certain individual differences might interact to produce differential effects. Thus, a moderated model was tested examining the interaction of cognitive failure and conscientiousness. It was found that cognitive failure moderated the relationship between conscientiousness and accidents and unsafe work behaviors. Overall, results suggest that cognitive failure plays an important part in individual safety behavior, especially when conscientiousness is low.

摘要

本研究通过两项研究调查了认知失误对工作场所安全和事故的影响。研究假设认知失误将直接预测安全行为和工作场所事故,并且在尽责性之外预测这些结果。研究发现认知失误独特地解释了工作场所安全行为和事故。然而,研究人员指出某些个体差异可能相互作用产生不同的影响。因此,测试了一个调节模型,考察认知失误和尽责性的相互作用。研究发现认知失误调节了尽责性与事故及不安全工作行为之间的关系。总体而言,结果表明认知失误在个体安全行为中起着重要作用,尤其是在尽责性较低时。

相似文献

1
Workplace safety performance: conscientiousness, cognitive failure, and their interaction.工作场所安全绩效:尽责性、认知失误及其相互作用。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2003 Oct;8(4):316-27. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.8.4.316.
2
Task-contingent conscientiousness as a unit of personality at work.任务定向的尽责性:工作中的人格单位。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Sep;95(5):793-806. doi: 10.1037/a0020016.
3
The role of psychological factors in workplace safety.心理因素在工作场所安全中的作用。
Ergonomics. 2013;56(12):1928-39. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2013.851282. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
4
Workplace safety: a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors.工作场所安全:人员与情境因素作用的荟萃分析
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Sep;94(5):1103-27. doi: 10.1037/a0016172.
5
Effects of safety climate on safety norm violations: exploring the mediating role of attitudinal ambivalence toward personal protective equipment.安全氛围对安全规范违规的影响:探讨个人防护设备态度矛盾的中介作用。
J Safety Res. 2009;40(4):277-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2009.06.002. Epub 2009 Aug 4.
6
The effect of workers' visibility on effectiveness of intervention programs: supervisory-based safety interventions.员工可见性对干预计划效果的影响:基于监督的安全干预措施。
J Safety Res. 2008;39(3):273-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2007.12.003. Epub 2008 Apr 10.
7
Interactive effects of personality and perceptions of the work situation on workplace deviance.个性与对工作情境的认知对工作场所偏差行为的交互作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2004 Aug;89(4):599-609. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.599.
8
Occupational safety: application of the job demand-control-support model.职业安全:工作要求-控制-支持模型的应用
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Sep;40(5):1713-23. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.06.008. Epub 2008 Jul 3.
9
Exploratory analysis of the safety climate and safety behavior relationship.安全氛围与安全行为关系的探索性分析
J Safety Res. 2004;35(5):497-512. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2004.08.004.
10
How safe are federal regulations on occupational alcohol use?联邦政府关于职业酒精使用的规定有多安全?
J Public Health Policy. 2006;27(4):389-404. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jphp.3200104.

引用本文的文献

1
Positive and Negative Affect Differentially Predict Individual Differences and Intra-Individual Changes in Daily Cognitive Failures in Younger and Older Adults.积极情绪和消极情绪对年轻人和老年人日常认知失误中的个体差异和个体内部变化具有不同的预测作用。
Brain Sci. 2024 Dec 15;14(12):1259. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14121259.
2
The effect of occupational burnout on cognitive failure and general health in industrial workers (case study: Iran Tire Factory).职业倦怠对产业工人认知功能衰退及总体健康状况的影响(案例研究:伊朗轮胎厂)
Health Psychol Rep. 2022 May 6;11(2):166-175. doi: 10.5114/hpr.2022.115659. eCollection 2023.
3
A d factor? Understanding trait distractibility and its relationships with ADHD symptomatology and hyperfocus.
注意分散特质?理解特质性注意力分散及其与 ADHD 症状和专注度的关系。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 25;18(10):e0292215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292215. eCollection 2023.
4
Personality traits and perceived cognitive function in lebanese healthcare professionals.黎巴嫩医护人员的人格特质与感知认知功能。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Mar 31;11(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01139-w.
5
The Predictors of Unsafe Behaviors among Nuclear Power Plant Workers: An Investigation Integrating Personality, Cognitive and Attitudinal Factors.核电厂工人不安全行为的预测因素:综合人格、认知和态度因素的研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 1;20(1):820. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010820.
6
Problematic internet use and safety behavior: The moderating role of safety climate.网络使用问题与安全行为:安全氛围的调节作用。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 30;17(12):e0279767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279767. eCollection 2022.
7
Investigating the Effects of Personality on the Safety Behavior of Gold Mine Workers: A Moderated Mediation Approach.探究人格对金矿工人安全行为的影响:有调节的中介作用方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 30;19(23):16054. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316054.
8
Safety not guaranteed: Investigating employees' safety performance during a global pandemic.安全无法保障:调查全球大流行期间员工的安全表现。
Saf Sci. 2023 Feb;158:105950. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105950. Epub 2022 Oct 23.
9
Association of Personality with Cognitive Failure among Japanese Middle-Aged and Older Adults.人格特质与日本中老年人群认知失败的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 12;19(12):7215. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127215.
10
Measuring Failures Proneness: Scale Development and Preliminary Validations.测量故障倾向:量表编制与初步验证
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 13;12:757051. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.757051. eCollection 2021.