Nunes Silvia, Ruokonen Esko, Takala Jukka
Critical Care Research Program, Division of Intensive Care, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care , Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Department of Intensive Care, Bern University Hospital-Inselspital, 3010 , Bern, Switzerland.
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Dec;29(12):2174-2179. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2036-0. Epub 2003 Oct 29.
(1). To describe the evolution of pulmonary capillary pressure (Pcap) and of the pressure drop across the pulmonary venous bed from early to established acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), (2). to assess Pcap under different levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and (3). to compare the visual method and a mathematical model to determine Pcap.
Prospective, intervention study.
Intensive care unit in a teaching institution.
Nine ARDS patients, according to the ARDS Consensus Conference criteria.
Pulmonary arterial pressures were measured during routine respiratory mechanics measurements throughout ARDS. Four PEEP levels (6, 9, 12 and 15 cmH(2)O) were studied.
Pulmonary artery occlusions were made in triplicate at each PEEP level. Pcap was determined for every occlusion trace by three observers (visual method) and a mathematical model. Diastolic pulmonary artery pressure (PAPd) and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP) were measured. The visually determined Pcap showed a bias of 2.5+/-2.1 mmHg as compared to the mathematical estimation. PAPd, Pcap and PAOP tended to decrease from early to late ARDS ( p=0.128, 0.265, 0.121). Pcap-PAOP (6.3+/-2.7 mmHg) did not change throughout ARDS. Higher PEEP levels were associated with increased PAPd, Pcap and PAOP, as well as with larger Pcap-PAOP throughout ARDS.
Pulmonary capillary pressure cannot be predicted from PAOP during early and established ARDS. The high variability in Pcap-PAOP increases the risk for underestimation of filtration pressures and consequently the risk for lung edema. Pcap can be estimated at the bedside by either the visual or mathematical methods.
(1)描述从早期到确诊的急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)期间肺毛细血管压(Pcap)及肺静脉床压力差的变化;(2)评估不同呼气末正压(PEEP)水平下的Pcap;(3)比较视觉法和数学模型测定Pcap的情况。
前瞻性干预研究。
教学机构的重症监护病房。
9例符合ARDS共识会议标准的ARDS患者。
在ARDS病程中进行常规呼吸力学测量时测量肺动脉压。研究了4个PEEP水平(6、9、12和15 cmH₂O)。
在每个PEEP水平重复进行3次肺动脉闭塞。由3名观察者(视觉法)和一个数学模型对每次闭塞曲线测定Pcap。测量舒张期肺动脉压(PAPd)和肺动脉闭塞压(PAOP)。与数学估计值相比,视觉法测定的Pcap偏差为2.5±2.1 mmHg。从ARDS早期到晚期,PAPd、Pcap和PAOP呈下降趋势(p = 0.128、0.265、0.121)。在整个ARDS病程中,Pcap - PAOP(6.3±2.7 mmHg)无变化。较高的PEEP水平与整个ARDS病程中PAPd、Pcap和PAOP升高以及Pcap - PAOP增大有关。
在早期和确诊的ARDS期间,无法根据PAOP预测肺毛细血管压。Pcap - PAOP的高度变异性增加了低估滤过压的风险,从而增加了肺水肿的风险。可通过视觉法或数学方法在床边估计Pcap。