Panerai R B, Chacon M, Pereira R, Evans D H
Division of Medical Physics, Leicester and Warwick Medical Schools, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, LE1 5WW, UK.
Med Eng Phys. 2004 Jan;26(1):43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2003.08.001.
A time lagged recurrent neural network (TLRN) was implemented to model the dynamic relationship between arterial blood pressure (ABP) and cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) and its performance was compared to classical linear model such as transfer function analysis, Aaslid's dynamic autoregulation model, and the Wiener-Laguerre moving average filter. A simple linear regression was also tested as a naive estimator. In 16 normal subjects, CBFV was continuously recorded with Doppler ultrasound and ABP with the Finapres device during six repeated thigh cuff manoeuvres. Using mean beat-to-beat values of ABP as input and CBFV as output, the performance of each method was assessed by the model's predicted velocity correlation coefficient and normalized mean square error (MSE). Cross-validation was performed using three thigh cuff manoeuvres for the training data set and the other three for the validation set. The four methods studied performed significantly better than the zero-order naive estimator. The TLRN performed better than transfer function analysis, but was not significantly different from the time-domain techniques, despite showing the minimum predictive MSE. CBFV step responses could be extracted from the TLRN showing the presence of non-linear behaviour both in terms of amplitude and directionality.
采用时滞递归神经网络(TLRN)对动脉血压(ABP)和脑血流速度(CBFV)之间的动态关系进行建模,并将其性能与传统线性模型(如传递函数分析、阿斯利德动态自动调节模型和维纳 - 拉盖尔移动平均滤波器)进行比较。还测试了简单线性回归作为一种朴素估计器。在16名正常受试者中,在六次重复的大腿袖带操作期间,使用多普勒超声连续记录CBFV,使用Finapres设备记录ABP。以ABP的逐搏平均值作为输入,CBFV作为输出,通过模型预测的速度相关系数和归一化均方误差(MSE)评估每种方法的性能。使用三次大腿袖带操作的数据作为训练数据集,另外三次作为验证集进行交叉验证。所研究的四种方法的性能明显优于零阶朴素估计器。TLRN的性能优于传递函数分析,但与时域技术相比没有显著差异,尽管其预测MSE最小。可以从TLRN中提取CBFV阶跃响应,表明在幅度和方向性方面均存在非线性行为。