Suppr超能文献

动作-效应学习中的临近性与偶然性。

Contiguity and contingency in action-effect learning.

作者信息

Elsner Birgit, Hommel Bernhard

机构信息

Department of Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Psychological Research, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2004 Apr;68(2-3):138-54. doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0151-8. Epub 2003 Dec 18.

Abstract

According to the two-stage model of voluntary action, the ability to perform voluntary action is acquired in two sequential steps. Firstly, associations are acquired between representations of movements and of the effects that frequently follow them. Secondly, the anticipation or perception of an acquired action effect primes the movement that has been learnt to produce this effect; the acquired action-effect associations thus mediate the selection of actions that are most appropriate to achieve an intended action goal. If action-effect learning has an associative basis, it should be influenced by factors that are known to affect instrumental learning, such as the temporal contiguity and the probabilistic contingency of movement and effect. In two experiments, the contiguity or the contingency between key presses and subsequent tones was manipulated in various ways. As expected, both factors affected the acquisition of action-effect relations as assessed by the potency of action effects to prime the corresponding action in a later behavioral test. In particular, evidence of action-effect associations was obtained only if the effect of the action was delayed for no more than 1 s, if the effect appeared more often in the presence than in the absence of the action, or if action and effect were entirely uncorrelated but the effect appeared very often. These findings support the assumption that the control of voluntary actions is based on action-effect representations that are acquired by associative learning mechanisms.

摘要

根据自愿行动的两阶段模型,执行自愿行动的能力是通过两个连续步骤获得的。首先,在动作表征与经常随之而来的效果表征之间建立关联。其次,对习得的动作效果的预期或感知会启动已学会产生此效果的动作;因此,习得的动作-效果关联介导了对最适合实现预期动作目标的动作的选择。如果动作-效果学习具有关联基础,那么它应该会受到已知影响工具性学习的因素的影响,例如动作与效果的时间接近性和概率性偶然性。在两个实验中,以各种方式操纵按键与随后音调之间的接近性或偶然性。正如预期的那样,这两个因素都影响了动作-效果关系的习得,这是通过动作效果在后续行为测试中启动相应动作的效力来评估的。特别是,只有在动作效果延迟不超过1秒、效果在动作出现时比不出现时更频繁出现、或者动作和效果完全不相关但效果非常频繁出现的情况下,才获得了动作-效果关联的证据。这些发现支持了这样一种假设,即自愿行动的控制基于通过关联学习机制获得的动作-效果表征。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验