Repace J
Repace Associates, Inc, 101 Felicia Lane, Bowie 20720, USA.
Tob Control. 2004 Mar;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i8-19. doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.003111.
To assess the contribution of secondhand smoke (SHS) to aircraft cabin air pollution and flight attendants' SHS exposure relative to the general population.
Published air quality measurements, modelling studies, and dosimetry studies were reviewed, analysed, and generalised.
Flight attendants reported suffering greatly from SHS pollution on aircraft. Both government and airline sponsored studies concluded that SHS created an air pollution problem in aircraft cabins, while tobacco industry sponsored studies yielding similar data concluded that ventilation controlled SHS, and that SHS pollution levels were low. Between the time that non-smoking sections were established on US carriers in 1973, and the two hour US smoking ban in 1988, commercial aircraft ventilation rates had declined three times as fast as smoking prevalence. The aircraft cabin provided the least volume and lowest ventilation rate per smoker of any social venue, including stand up bars and smoking lounges, and afforded an abnormal respiratory environment. Personal monitors showed little difference in SHS exposures between flight attendants assigned to smoking sections and those assigned to non-smoking sections of aircraft cabins.
In-flight air quality measurements in approximately 250 aircraft, generalised by models, indicate that when smoking was permitted aloft, 95% of the harmful respirable suspended particle (RSP) air pollution in the smoking sections and 85% of that in the non-smoking sections of aircraft cabins was caused by SHS. Typical levels of SHS-RSP on aircraft violated current (PM(2.5)) federal air quality standards approximately threefold for flight attendants, and exceeded SHS irritation thresholds by 10 to 100 times. From cotinine dosimetry, SHS exposure of typical flight attendants in aircraft cabins is estimated to have been >6-fold that of the average US worker and approximately 14-fold that of the average person. Thus, ventilation systems massively failed to control SHS air pollution in aircraft cabins. These results have implications for studies of the past and future health of flight attendants.
评估二手烟(SHS)对飞机客舱空气污染的影响,以及空乘人员相对于普通人群的二手烟暴露情况。
对已发表的空气质量测量、模型研究和剂量学研究进行回顾、分析和归纳。
空乘人员报告称在飞机上深受二手烟污染之苦。政府和航空公司资助的研究均得出结论,二手烟在飞机客舱中造成了空气污染问题,而烟草行业资助的研究虽得出类似数据,但却认为通风可控制二手烟,且二手烟污染水平较低。从1973年美国航空公司设立无烟区到1988年美国实施两小时吸烟禁令期间,商用飞机的通风率下降速度是吸烟率下降速度的三倍。在包括站立式酒吧和吸烟室在内的任何社交场所中,飞机客舱为每位吸烟者提供的空间最小且通风率最低,营造了一个异常的呼吸环境。个人监测器显示,分配到飞机客舱吸烟区和无烟区的空乘人员的二手烟暴露情况几乎没有差异。
通过模型归纳,对约250架飞机进行的飞行中空气质量测量表明,当飞机上允许吸烟时,客舱吸烟区95%的有害可吸入悬浮颗粒(RSP)空气污染以及无烟区85%的此类污染是由二手烟造成的。飞机上二手烟-RSP的典型水平使空乘人员接触的污染程度约为现行(PM(2.5))联邦空气质量标准的三倍,超过二手烟刺激阈值10至100倍。根据可替宁剂量学估算,飞机客舱中典型空乘人员的二手烟暴露量是美国普通工人的6倍多,约为普通人的14倍。因此,通风系统在很大程度上未能控制飞机客舱中的二手烟空气污染。这些结果对空乘人员过去和未来的健康研究具有启示意义。