Mattox H E, Richter J E, Sinclair J W, Price J E, Case L D
Division of Gastroenterology, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103.
Dig Dis Sci. 1992 Aug;37(8):1185-91. doi: 10.1007/BF01296558.
Limiting the widespread use of 24-hr pH monitoring is the necessity of manometrically placing the pH probe 5 cm above the proximal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) border. Therefore, we prospectively compared LES localization by gastroesophageal pH step-up with manometry in 71 patients and 14 asymptomatic volunteers. The gastroesophageal pH step-up significantly correlated with the proximal LES border in patients (r = 0.53, P less than 0.0001) and volunteers (r = 0.91, P less than 0.0001). Based on previously published criteria, the pH step-up value was considered acceptably accurate if it was within +/- 3 cm (6 cm total span) of the manometrically determined proximal LES border. In 58% of patients and 29% of volunteers the pH step-up occurred outside this accuracy range. Esophagitis (P = 0.015) and abnormal reflux parameters (P = 0.002) were variables contributing to this error. Subsequent analysis found that the pH step-up overestimated the proximal LES border and occurred at the midportion of the sphincter. The pH step-up still inaccurately located the mid LES in 34% of patients. Therefore, manometry should remain the standard for accurate LES localization prior to placing the pH probe.
限制24小时pH监测广泛应用的因素是需要通过测压法将pH探头放置在食管下括约肌(LES)近端边界上方5厘米处。因此,我们前瞻性地比较了71例患者和14名无症状志愿者中通过胃食管pH值逐步升高法与测压法对LES定位的差异。胃食管pH值逐步升高法与患者(r = 0.53,P < 0.0001)和志愿者(r = 0.91,P < 0.0001)的LES近端边界显著相关。根据先前发表的标准,如果pH值逐步升高值在测压法确定的LES近端边界的±3厘米(总跨度6厘米)范围内,则认为其准确性可接受。在58%的患者和29%的志愿者中,pH值逐步升高超出了这个准确范围。食管炎(P = 0.015)和异常反流参数(P = 0.002)是导致这一误差的变量。后续分析发现,pH值逐步升高高估了LES近端边界,且发生在括约肌的中部。在34%的患者中,pH值逐步升高仍无法准确确定LES中部的位置。因此,在放置pH探头之前,测压法仍应作为准确LES定位的标准。