“求救”自杀预防项目的结果评估。
An outcome evaluation of the SOS Suicide Prevention Program.
作者信息
Aseltine Robert H, DeMartino Robert
机构信息
Department of Behavioral Sciences and Community Health, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA.
出版信息
Am J Public Health. 2004 Mar;94(3):446-51. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.3.446.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
We examined the effectiveness of the Signs of Suicide (SOS) prevention program in reducing suicidal behavior.
METHODS
Twenty-one hundred students in 5 high schools in Columbus, Ga, and Hartford, Conn, were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. Self-administered questionnaires were completed by students in both groups approximately 3 months after program implementation.
RESULTS
Significantly lower rates of suicide attempts and greater knowledge and more adaptive attitudes about depression and suicide were observed among students in the intervention group. The modest changes in knowledge and attitudes partially explained the beneficial effects of the program.
CONCLUSIONS
SOS is the first school-based suicide prevention program to demonstrate significant reductions in self-reported suicide attempts.
摘要
目的
我们研究了自杀迹象（SOS）预防项目在减少自杀行为方面的有效性。
方法
佐治亚州哥伦布市和康涅狄格州哈特福德市5所高中的2100名学生被随机分为干预组和对照组。两组学生在项目实施约3个月后自行填写问卷。
结果
干预组学生的自杀未遂率显著降低，对抑郁症和自杀有更多的了解及更适应性的态度。知识和态度的适度变化部分解释了该项目的有益效果。
结论
SOS是首个显示出自报自杀未遂显著减少的校内自杀预防项目。
相似文献
1
An outcome evaluation of the SOS Suicide Prevention Program.
Am J Public Health. 2004 Mar;94(3):446-51. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.3.446.
2
Evaluating the SOS suicide prevention program: a replication and extension.
BMC Public Health. 2007 Jul 18;7:161. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-161.
3
"Signs of Suicide" shows promise as a middle school suicide prevention program.
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2014 Dec;44(6):653-67. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12097. Epub 2014 May 2.
4
The SOS Suicide Prevention Program: Further Evidence of Efficacy and Effectiveness.
Prev Sci. 2016 Feb;17(2):157-66. doi: 10.1007/s11121-015-0594-3.
5
Preliminary effectiveness of surviving the teens(®) suicide prevention and depression awareness program on adolescents' suicidality and self-efficacy in performing help-seeking behaviors.
J Sch Health. 2011 Sep;81(9):581-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00630.x.
6
The effectiveness of a school-based adolescent depression education program.
Health Educ Behav. 2010 Feb;37(1):11-22. doi: 10.1177/1090198107303313. Epub 2007 Jul 25.
7
An outcome evaluation of the Sources of Strength suicide prevention program delivered by adolescent peer leaders in high schools.
Am J Public Health. 2010 Sep;100(9):1653-61. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.190025. Epub 2010 Jul 15.
8
Feasibility and Acceptability of the Youth Aware of Mental Health (YAM) Intervention in US Adolescents.
Arch Suicide Res. 2020 Apr-Jun;24(2):269-284. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2019.1624667. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
9
Depression knowledge in high school students: effectiveness of the adolescent depression awareness program.
J Affect Disord. 2013 Sep 25;150(3):1025-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.05.033. Epub 2013 Jun 18.
10
Emotionally troubled teens' help-seeking behaviors: an evaluation of surviving the Teens® suicide prevention and depression awareness program.
J Sch Nurs. 2014 Oct;30(5):366-75. doi: 10.1177/1059840513511494. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
引用本文的文献
1
Characterizing facilitators of and barriers to suicide prevention program development and use: An exploratory study.
J Fam Psychol. 2025 Aug 11. doi: 10.1037/fam0001397.
2
Effectiveness of Suicide Prevention Programmes Among Adolescents and Sociocultural Adaptation of Programmes: A Systematic Review.
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Apr;34(2):e70038. doi: 10.1111/inm.70038.
3
A scoping review of suicide prevention interventions for Latinx adults: strategies, gaps, and future directions.
Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 19;13:1481904. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1481904. eCollection 2025.
4
The impact of universal mental health screening on stigma in primary schools.
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2025 Jan 29;19(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13034-024-00854-5.
5
Experiences of Peer Mentoring Sexual and Gender Minority Emerging Adults Who Are at Risk for Suicide: Mixed Methods Study.
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 29;9:e67814. doi: 10.2196/67814.
6
Prevention of self-harm and suicide in young people up to the age of 25 in education settings.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 20;12(12):CD013844. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013844.pub2.
7
Text Messaging to Extend School-Based Suicide Prevention: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Dec 6;11:e56407. doi: 10.2196/56407.
8
Suicide Postvention in Schools: What Evidence Supports Our Current National Recommendations?
Sch Soc Work J. 2022 Spring;46(2):23-69. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
9
Addressing help-seeking, stigma and risk factors for suicidality in secondary schools: short-term and mid-term effects of the HEYLiFE suicide prevention program in a randomized controlled trial.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 8;24(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17557-9.
10
Reducing suicidal ideation in African American adolescents: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2024 Feb;92(2):61-74. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000849. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
本文引用的文献
1
Prevention's technology.
J Prim Prev. 1987 Sep;8(1-2):4-24. doi: 10.1007/BF01695016.
2
Youth risk behavior surveillance--United States, 1999.
MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 2000 Jun 9;49(5):1-32.
3
Immediate post intervention effects of two brief youth suicide prevention interventions.
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2001 Spring;31(1):41-61. doi: 10.1521/suli.31.1.41.21308.
4
Deaths: final data for 1998.
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2000 Jul 24;48(11):1-105.
5
Core elements of developmental epidemiologically based prevention research.
Am J Community Psychol. 1999 Aug;27(4):463-82. doi: 10.1023/A:1022129127298.
6
Methods of adolescent suicide prevention.
J Clin Psychiatry. 1999;60 Suppl 2:70-4; discussion 75-6, 113-6.
7
Epidemiology of DSM-III-R major depression and minor depression among adolescents and young adults in the National Comorbidity Survey.
Depress Anxiety. 1998;7(1):3-14. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6394(1998)7:1<3::aid-da2>3.0.co;2-f.
8
Some comments on frequently used multiple endpoint adjustment methods in clinical trials.
Stat Med. 1997 Nov 30;16(22):2529-42. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19971130)16:22<2529::aid-sim692>3.0.co;2-j.
9
A systematic overview of adolescent suicide prevention programs.
Can J Public Health. 1996 Sep-Oct;87(5):319-24.
10
Adjusting for multiple testing when reporting research results: the Bonferroni vs Holm methods.
Am J Public Health. 1996 May;86(5):726-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.5.726.
Zotero 插件