Mezer Eedy, Rootman David S, Abdolell Mohamed, Levin Alex V
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Mar;30(3):603-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.07.002.
To evaluate the refractive outcome using 5 intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas to determine which best predicts refraction after pediatric cataract surgery.
The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
This study comprised a review of the charts of 158 consecutive patients aged 2 to 17 years old who were operated on by 1 of 2 staff surgeons between May 1992 and April 2000. The surgeons performed a total of 206 cataract extractions with primary or secondary IOL implantation. The measured outcome was the actual refraction 2 to 6 months postoperatively versus the target refraction. Two regression formulas (SRK, SRK II) and 3 theoretical formulas (Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, SRK/T) were used to predict refractive outcome based on preoperative axial length, corneal curvature, IOL power, and the IOL A-constant provided by the manufacturer.
Forty-nine patients (59 IOL implantations) with available data 2 to 6 months after surgery were studied. Also analyzed were data from a subset of 31 patients (34 IOL implantations) with available data 2 to 3 months after surgery. There was poor to moderate agreement between the predicted and actual postoperative refractions using the SRK formula (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.50/0.04 [2- to 3-month follow-up/2- to 6-month follow-up]) and good or fair agreement using the other formulas (ICC from 0.60/0.24 for SRK II to 0.67/0.37 for Hoffer Q). The mean difference between the predicted and actual postoperative refractions with all formulas ranged from 1.06 to 1.22 diopters (D)/1.35 to 1.79 D (median 0.81 to 0.99 D/0.94 to 1.40 D; range 3.03 to 5.57 D/6.75 to 9.21 D). Using Holladay 1 and SRK, 9% to 18%/23% to 39% eyes were more than +/-2.00 D off the target outcome refraction.
All 5 IOL power calculation formulas were unsatisfactory in achieving the target refraction. This finding may have implications for predicting long-term outcomes, interpreting previous reports of refractive outcomes, and obtaining preoperative informed consent in a clinical setting.
使用5种人工晶状体(IOL)计算公式评估屈光结果,以确定哪种公式能最佳预测小儿白内障手术后的屈光情况。
加拿大多伦多病童医院。
本研究回顾了1992年5月至2000年4月期间由2名 staff surgeons 之一为158例年龄在2至17岁的连续患者所做的病历。这些外科医生共进行了206次白内障摘除术并植入一期或二期人工晶状体。测量的结果是术后2至6个月的实际屈光度数与目标屈光度数。使用两种回归公式(SRK、SRK II)和三种理论公式(Holladay 1、Hoffer Q、SRK/T),根据术前眼轴长度、角膜曲率、人工晶状体度数以及制造商提供的人工晶状体A常数来预测屈光结果。
对49例患者(59次人工晶状体植入)进行了研究,这些患者在术后2至6个月有可用数据。还分析了31例患者(34次人工晶状体植入)的子集数据,这些患者在术后2至3个月有可用数据。使用SRK公式时,预测的和实际的术后屈光之间的一致性较差至中等(组内相关系数[ICC]=0.50/0.04[2至3个月随访/2至6个月随访]),而使用其他公式时一致性良好或中等(SRK II的ICC为0.60/0.24至Hoffer Q的ICC为0.67/0.37)。所有公式预测的和实际的术后屈光之间的平均差值范围为1.06至1.22屈光度(D)/1.35至1.79 D(中位数0.81至0.99 D/0.94至1.40 D;范围3.03至5.57 D/6.75至9.21 D)。使用Holladay 1和SRK公式时,9%至18%/23%至39%的眼睛偏离目标屈光结果超过±2.00 D。
所有5种人工晶状体度数计算公式在实现目标屈光方面均不令人满意。这一发现可能对预测长期结果、解释先前的屈光结果报告以及在临床环境中获得术前知情同意有影响。