Jerant Anthony F, Azari Rahman S, Nesbitt Thomas S, Meyers Frederick J
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, Calif 95817, USA.
Ann Fam Med. 2004 Jan-Feb;2(1):54-60. doi: 10.1370/afm.29.
Substantial shortfalls in the quality of palliative care of the elderly can be attributed to 5 fundamental flaws in the way end-of-life care is currently delivered. First, palliative care is viewed as a terminal event rather than a longitudinal process, resulting in a reactive approach and unnecessary preterminal distress in elderly patients suffering from chronic, slowly progressive illnesses. Second, palliative care is defined in terms of a false dichotomy between symptomatic and disease-focused treatment, which distracts attention from the proper focus of healing illness. Third, the decision about whether the focus of care should be palliative is not negotiated among patients, family members, and providers. Fourth, patient autonomy in making treatment choices is accorded undue prominence relative to more salient patient choices, such as coming to terms with their place in the trajectory of chronic illness. Fifth, palliative care is a parallel system rather than an integrated primary care process. A new theoretical framework--the TLC model--addresses these flaws in the provision of palliative care for elderly persons. In this model, optimal palliative care is envisioned as timely and team oriented, longitudinal, collaborative and comprehensive. The model is informed by the chronic illness care, shared decision making, and comprehensive geriatric assessment research literature, as well as previous palliative care research. Preliminary results of an intervention for elderly assisted living residents based on the TLC model support its promise as a framework for optimizing palliative care of elders.
老年人姑息治疗质量的严重不足可归因于当前临终关怀提供方式的5个根本缺陷。首先,姑息治疗被视为一个终末期事件而非一个纵向过程,导致采取被动应对方式,并给患有慢性、进展缓慢疾病的老年患者带来不必要的临终前痛苦。其次,姑息治疗依据症状治疗和以疾病为重点的治疗之间的错误二分法来定义,这分散了对治愈疾病这一恰当重点的注意力。第三,关于护理重点是否应为姑息治疗的决定,并未在患者、家庭成员和提供者之间进行协商。第四,在做出治疗选择时,患者自主权相对于更突出的患者选择,如接受自己在慢性病病程中的位置,被给予了过度的重视。第五,姑息治疗是一个并行系统,而非一个整合的初级护理过程。一个新的理论框架——TLC模型——解决了为老年人提供姑息治疗方面的这些缺陷。在这个模型中,最佳姑息治疗被设想为及时的、以团队为导向的、纵向的、协作的和全面的。该模型以慢性病护理、共同决策和综合老年评估研究文献以及先前的姑息治疗研究为依据。基于TLC模型对老年辅助生活居民进行干预的初步结果,支持了其作为优化老年人姑息治疗框架的前景。